Actually, they found a prehistoric fish.
2007-01-14 12:53:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
And then Raymond Burr rallied the Japanese Defense Force to force it back into the sea saving Tokyo.
You may have confused the movie Godzilla for a Nova episode....happens a lot.
2007-01-14 20:58:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by tk 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
A decomposing basking shark is not a dinosaur.
2007-01-14 21:11:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by February Rain 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Aweee...
Poor wittle Fishy-Dinosauree thingy...
2007-01-14 23:05:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Wilde Katze 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dino tracks have also been found in the same layer of bedrock (in Texas, among other sites) as human footprints. Evolutionists turn their collective backs to this evidence for it proves that they are following a lie.
2007-01-14 20:57:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jeff C 4
·
1⤊
5⤋
Your site can blow me. Creationism is for the weak of mind. You sir are a sheep, follow the herd and shut up.
2007-01-14 20:58:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by farley101us 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
You get your news from the Weekly World News, don't you?
That explains a lot.
2007-01-14 20:54:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
No I did not know about that. Tell me more What a pity this dinosaurus was dead and not alive!
2007-01-14 21:03:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by Nicolette 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Dude, not true. But if they had it would be evidence of evolution, not creationism.
2007-01-14 21:00:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Michael da Man 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
again we require a cited source geeker
2007-01-14 20:56:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Sean 5
·
0⤊
3⤋