English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

Seems like it might have been an interesting question if it made any sense and was an actual question?

2007-01-14 09:46:26 · answer #1 · answered by Lillithin 3 · 1 0

No. It illustrates ignorance. You will find that in advanced societies, the study of indigenous religions has become almost like a spiritual quest. I know this is the situation in Australia and the study of aborigine spirituality is considered the highest calling.

2007-01-14 17:55:57 · answer #2 · answered by Freddy F 4 · 0 0

I do feel it is sad that the dominant religions, in order to stay on top, or in order to collect more people, to stay more dominate need muscle in on the others religions.

Its a shame only because you loose the native characteristics of there earthly religion. And only some of the people will remember there trible rituals and history, but some of the little things will be lost forever.

2007-01-14 17:50:38 · answer #3 · answered by A Lady Dragon 5 · 0 0

At least in the US it does, where native religions were considered "savage"

2007-01-14 17:47:20 · answer #4 · answered by Bleaarg 3 · 0 0

History has always been written by the winners.

2007-01-14 17:45:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nature, The big dog pissed on the little dog.

2007-01-14 17:46:47 · answer #6 · answered by Mad Dog Johnson 4 · 1 0

I think that pretty much sums it up

2007-01-14 17:55:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

which one is negative?

2007-01-14 17:46:53 · answer #8 · answered by Sean 5 · 0 0

nope.

2007-01-14 17:45:33 · answer #9 · answered by whynotaskdon 7 · 0 1

I say "Amen".

2007-01-14 17:46:27 · answer #10 · answered by Wisdom Lies in the Heart 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers