2nd Ammendment right against tyrants in our government?

Question

Lets say for example, a prosecutor throws the book at my 80 year old mother for J walking and prosecutes to the full extent of the law causing her to be jailed and die in jail in a week. Can this prosecutor be viewed as a tyrant under President Jefferson, Washington & first Secretary of Treasury Alexander Hamilton's statements. Basically when they said the 2nd Ammendment is also to protect us from a tyrannical government, let the government know that the people will take arms against tyrant's when all other recourse fails. Question: Is this prosecutor a tyrant?

I might have asked this in the wrong section, too late now, but after all who knows more about the 2nd Ammendment than hunters?
Let me expand this question. Does anyone here actually believe that an individual or even a large group can actually fight the government? No way, impossible, it's not going to happen and should not happen because overall the government is good. Although there are tyrants in the government that can and sometimes do make your life a living hell and result in the death of a loved one. The only way we are going to fight a tyrannical government is one tyrant at a time, we cannot fight the whole government.
Isn't this what Thomas Jefferson meant when he said "Let the government know that the people will take up arms". Basically, do not be a tyrant, or else, and tyrants need to be eliminated for the greater good.
Definition of tyrant= A ruler who exercises power in a harsh, cruel manner.
Looking for more answers to: Is this prosecutor a tyrant?

Answer 1

The 2nd Amendment, Is The Right to Bare Arms!

But to answer your question.

Over zealous maybe, but Tyrannical no.
She was not PUT to Death for jaywalking.
She was put in jail.
She died of old age.
Lets say she took a gun and shot some one.
Are you saying age should be factored in to the equation and she should not be punished.
Thank about the world in which you live, Not Dream.
That very ideology is what brought about so many violent acts by under age kids.
They felt due to their age they could not receive maximum punishment and could get by with murder, Literally.
Consider Causality.
Who to say a driver with in the speed limit veers off so as to not hit the 80 year old lady jaywalker inadvertently runs over a innocent child.
Are you saying the 80 year old lady unwillingness to obey laws designed to protect her safety and others, is not partly at fault for the death of a Innocent Child.
It is apparent you are not the loving parent of a now dead child.

In response to your up date,

Ask mother England, She got spanked and sent back across the pond.

Now you say you cant fight who?

But you must be smarten enough to pick your fights.
It is WE THE PEOPLE, not we the government.
If your theory was right and sound , we would have lost our Guns like most of the World.

Answer 2

That was the idea behind "Peoples Militias"
It was to keep our government from getting to high handed.
The Judge in the case you mention is open for civil prosecution. ask again in the legal section.
As a direct result of his action he caused a death. This can be manslaughter. Jaywalking is not a felony so he does not have the defense of being a judge.
Contact both media and a cut throat attorney. they eat this up.

Answer 3

What i don't get is that each and each 4 minutes somebody dies on a street interior the U. S. as a site visitors fatality. This dying fee is many situations extra suitable than deaths simply by weapons. while are automobiles going to be banned? notwithstanding that's an previous cliche that's fairly real that once weapons are outlawed, purely outlaws might have weapons. that's stupidity to think of a regulation banning the possession of firearms might have an significant effect on crimes dedicated with weapons. The criminals won't care approximately some new regulation from now on than they care approximately contemporary ones. in my view, i admire that actuality i'm able to preserve myself if mandatory. till then, my weapons purely come out for upkeep.

Answer 4

No...Not even close. The 2nd is about guns and only guns...the right to have and the right to use if the government decides to do what THEY want and decides not to listen to the people anymore. Its not about prosecutors or about stupid little legal problems that stupid little people may have...the bill of rights are about the big picture not the little stuff.

Answer 5

If the prosecutor is Mike Nifong then do what you have to do and you will be a hero...

Answer 6

no he is not , she broke the law her age has nothing to do with it. her health is not the goverments fault. she died at the wrong time i guess

Answer 7

This is the sports section, dumbass.