what do you think of bush plan to sent in more troops to Iraq ?

Question

i think it will be a disaster .

Answer 1

You are so right about it being a disaster in every way possible and that will not be any good for working toward peace no matter how you look at it.
That idiot has got to be stopped before he causes the end of this once great country of ours. If he continues as he plans to do he will cause more harm that will never be mended no matter who is our next president will be.
Who is Bush getting his stupid ideas from anyway? I wish his old man would stay the hell out of this countries business cause he isn't president any longer and for that much I am grateful for.
I may get blasted for my answer but this is how I see it and so many others see it this way too.
As for sending more of our innocent troops over there, how many more does he need to die before someone steps in and takes his rattle away from him anyway?
I will always support our troops but will not support Bush in his acts of terrorism.
Why not just bring everyone back home where they all belong?

Answer 2

It already is a disaster, we never should have gone there in the first place. However, since we are now stuck in this mess, I agree that more troops should be sent to protect the guys that are already there. Then in a few days we need to get the heck out of there. It doesn't matter if we leave today or ten years from now, the country of Iraq will be in disarray for many years.

Answer 3

Bush went into this conflict with obtrusive data of guns of mass destruction with anybody's help. once no such guns were stumbled on and public opinion replaced palms began to be pointed. So comparable to the youngster who ought to come on your position and pull out all of your toys and then immediately go away. Bush is left cleansing up the mess. Will the troops help? probable not. not without the help from this usa it truly is at conflict. it truly is a nasty mess. i'm confident the Islamic Terrorists chuckle anytime we commence blaming Bush for a multitude that in simple terms about all voted to flow. it really is better than only a Democrat as against Republican debate.

Answer 4

Better late than never. I fear it still won't be enough. The Army C.G. screwed the pooch by not securing the borders. Will the Navy Admiral think this one through? The sooner we get this place secured, the sooner we can commence mop up operations and get the heck out of Dodge. You can't win a war just by bombing them back into the stone ages. You have to put boots on the ground. An insufficient amount of boots leaves you where we are currently.

Answer 5

What scares me is that Bush is making the decisions (the Decider).

I would like the generals in command to have full authority to add or subtract.

They would have chosen to double the amount of troops at the beginning, but Rummy was stubborn, so we are where we are.

Answer 6

I think its the dumbest idea yet. Did you notice that after it was announced we would send in 21500 more troops the "allies" announced they were pulling out of Iraq? Even our own generals have said all this would do is provide more targets for the insurgents.The reasons we went in never proved true, its all lies. Our poor soldiers need to come home now! Not to mention the money that my kids will be paying to pay this debt. Whatever happened to the Iraq oil money that was going to pay for all this?
And don't wave the flag and claim its our duty to support the prez, its your duty to question and open your eyes to whats going on.

Answer 7

You oppose having more protection for the troops there now?

Answer 8

I think it is neccessary. God Bless the United States of America, our President and all of our Milityary Personell stationed around the World.

Answer 9

i HATE TO SEE MORE TROOPS SENT TO Iraq BUT IF MORE MUST BE SENT TO SETTLE THINGS THERE, THEN IT MUST BE DONE.

Answer 10

It's all about THIS evil secret!...
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/archive.cgi?noframes;read=73518