The term is "inbreeding", incest refers to when humans do it, both hinder the development of the gene pool eventually leading to extinction if the problem is not repaired.
I agree, yet I have yet to hear a plausible answer from the creationist party.
2007-01-14 05:35:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
The gators and bulldogs ate everything. They are all that is left.
See you in Jacksonville.(And, don’t park your ugly ark under the drawbridge.)
Nice game.
--------------------------
Earl D -
What would be astronomical in odds is life NOT occurring on earth. All the ingredients to form living molecules were present as was the environment (water being the critical variable here).
The difference between a ‘living’ and ‘non living’ molecule is difficult to define. The is no great jump or leap from one state to the other.
The difference is in bio-chemical reactions based on known processes. What we know about how to accomplish this is light years beyond what we do not know.
If you want to argue against evolution (a hopeless and futile task doomed to defeat) you should at least educate yourself on the topic. But then, if you did study the facts, you would know that evolution is irrefutably true, and you would recognize that your current belief is as invalid and untenable as it was for those believers who clung to the mistaken notion that the earth was flat and occupied the immovable center of the universe.
2007-01-14 05:38:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
God made them in the first place he set the sun in the right place and made the moon just the right size and created the animals in the first place. When Jesus was on earth he miraculously provided food and water and wine. Caused the Manna to fall which scientifically is impossible. If you read the account of how it happened. Or look at a bumble bee, scientifically he shouldn't be able to fly. But he does. How do you know he didn't even make more animals that were not allowed on the ark on other continents. Like a kangaroo or a walabeast.
They are the real super powers, not us or the scientists.
2007-01-14 05:37:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Steven 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
easily it is a undemanding false impression that there have been 2 of each. in case you study Genesis you spot that it exchange into 7 of each. This supply you a greater useful gene pool. as properly, line breeding interior of animals is undemanding even as we communicate. by way of fact the 1st offspring are a million/2 of each ensure, you nevertheless breed to a minimum of one ensure and this alterations the genes slightly greater then you certainly pass returned and surprisingly quickly you may returned loop over generations and this brings out dormant characteristics that regulate returned etc.
2016-12-16 04:34:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They don't understand evolution... we can't ever expect them to. I try my best but always end up with the same result... a bunch of refutations based on ignorance and misinformation.
The truth is they don't want to accept the facts of the world because it would challenge their religious beliefs. Sadly some people seem as if they wouldn't be able to function in life with out that security blanket.
2007-01-14 05:38:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by ChooseRealityPLEASE 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The thing is (don't ya see) that everyone has it all wrong!
Because regarding, "Which came first, the Chicken or the egg?" - the answer is the egg! Because Noah didn't take two of everything all hatched and ready to go! He took embryos of critters, man and beast, fowl, creepeth things and cattle.
Then it was that the fowl hatched and;
Two birds went aloft when the rains abated
A Dove and a Raven, across the land Created.
Twice to return, the Dove alone,
Yet again _ Away its flown.
Don't ya see?
.
.
2007-01-14 05:42:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by james 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Well to be fair, Cleopatra was the result of 11 generations of brother-sister marriages.
So it is possible.
But the basic fact is; the flood is a myth, nothing more.
2007-01-14 05:50:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Yoda Greene 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
well i dont believe in noahs ark but we are all the product of incest if you go far enough back along the evolutinary line.
2007-01-14 05:33:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by vibrance0404 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
No
How did you think we did it to begin with if it all started with one amobea or one bactrium.
How did you think Humans came from one Amoeba.
Let me see. On on day in the evolution of the world there magically appeared 1 million humans and they spawned a race.
Sorry, the odds of ONE human magically occuring are high. Getting one million to appear in the time frame of 20 years is astronomical!
2007-01-14 05:35:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
The same way they did before the flood. Do the math. There is nothing new here. Its the same then as it is now.
2007-01-14 05:33:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by having fun 3
·
0⤊
2⤋