Toyota must obviously have smarter engineers right? Nah.
2007-01-14 02:38:18 · 14 answers · asked by cbmtrx 2 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Car Makes ➔ Toyota
Simply put it is the design of engine fuel mangement and co-effiecent design of vehicle. Those MPG figures of course will vary by driving habits. But design of car and how well it utilizes fuel does go a long way. Plus add into weights of both vehicles.
2007-01-14 02:42:49 · answer #1 · answered by logan 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It has to do with the technology used in the engine. For example, The Lexus LS has a 4.6l V8 and still manages 27 MPG. The Ford Taurus gets the same mileage and only has a 3.0 L V6. The Lexus has direct injection, technology that Ford engineers have never even heard of.
Even though I'm a huge Toyota fan, I will admit that Honda is very close, but still not as popular. It's not that Toyota engineers are smarter. The Corolla is simple a bigger better car, thus it has somewhat more advanced technology in it for better efficiency. Remember, vehicle and engine size don't always matter when it comes to EPA ratings.
2007-01-14 13:47:46 · answer #2 · answered by Nemo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Among the reasons stated by others... I'd like to add that the Toyota 1.8l probably has that VVT-i engine which is better than the one in the Fit... Better as in lesser fuel consumption... Even if the test figures can vary, Toyota do have a smarter engine compared to the Honda... better design (don't think so? Well, I do), better engine management etc.
2007-01-14 12:18:53 · answer #3 · answered by Silver 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Its not all about the liters. And Yes toyota makes a better engine! Dont get either or those cars though. It is worth it to get either the camery or even the Scion TC. The 2 cars you mention are cheaper then the 2 I mentioned but in the long run they are worth it.
2007-01-14 10:42:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
On top of what was said I'd say your main contributing factor is your fuel injection system. Atomization of the fuel can greatly alter efficiency as shown in port and polish performance applications. And by the way no matter what you buy expect 5-10mpg less than advertised.
2007-01-15 00:37:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. Liters are not everything. Other factors are engine design, transmission gearing, axle ratio, tire size, friction, and 50 more variables.
2. A smaller engine has to work harder to make the same weight of car go the same speed. (I don't know the weights of these 2 cars.)
3. MPG ratings are extrememely subjective.
2007-01-14 11:31:08 · answer #6 · answered by Dave H 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
look at two identical engines side by side. each has the same goodies on it that the other does. But when installed in identical vehicles, the performances and fuel economies will be different.
gearing in the read and or front end, and tranny types are factors as well. don't rule out the fact that the amount of fuel the injecters push when they open are considered
2007-01-14 10:45:47 · answer #7 · answered by duster 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the difference is multiple factors.first it is only an estimate by the the government.they do not actually test the vehicles,only estimate it on certain input.there is a weight factor,horse power,gear ratio,aerodynamics,tires used. the engine,it has more cubic inches,less work for it,or it is easier for it.only a couple but they count.
2007-01-14 16:22:50 · answer #8 · answered by JB 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would take a look at the type of Gas you use. In Connecticut because of the additives they use, I get much less miles per gallon, I do not fill up with gas in Ct. on a long trip and get better miles per gallon.
2007-01-14 10:43:51 · answer #9 · answered by Clarence A 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My 2.5L 1988 Pontiac Fiero get 45mpg on the free way and around 40 in town. I would say both companies are stupid.
2007-01-14 10:41:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋