English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why is it always at our expense and our responsibility to save the world? Why is the situation always the same? We go in get the blame, lose our soldiers lives? We always lose Billions of dollars? Why doesn't Saudi send in their soldiers, or buy some soldiers with all their big bucks from oil? An American soldier is not for sale as far as I am concerned. Why not make these other countries get off their money and buy themselves those mercinaries? They do it every where else?

2007-01-13 22:41:29 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

Why don't they take a load off of Fanny?
Give to get? How about it guys? Why is it always the same? I don't want my boys going to save anyone over there unless those people are willing to help us in America to defeat the enemy and that goes for every one of those countries out there.

2007-01-13 22:44:42 · update #1

6 answers

THANK YOU..!!!

The rest of the world is just too lazy and too self-important to care about the anyone else but them.

Fact is, they would tear each other apart if it were not for the USA being around....

I mean, think about it.... if we were an isolationist country who WOULD they have to blame?

Oh yeah, thats right..... they'd STILL BLAME us because we have so much money and we're not HELPING them...

When we invaded Iraq we found German, French, and Russian hi-tech combat equipment.... something none of them were supposed to be selling Iraq by the UN mandate... but they did. Most of us knew why those three countries were opposed to the invasion, it was so the UN and the World would never find out how much money they were paid by Saddam under the table.

2007-01-13 22:54:02 · answer #1 · answered by wolf560 5 · 1 0

I agree... I totally agree with you. No one even asked this q. either in the UN or at any public forum or in the media. I am glad you are asking the same Q I have been asking since the beginning of this war.

Are we the punch bag ? The greatest president we now have, who speaks his mind, the one that does not mince words, stays focussed - gets all the blame? From fellow Americans to boot.? Shame, shame. People have mud in their heads. They can't think.

Why can't Saudis - the money bag - get off their fanny and do something? That money was just handed to them by USA because of oil. They did not manufacture, do innovation, create a new idea like many American companies do, produce profitably or be a leader at something. Nature gives it. They take it. Nothing is further from the truth and nothing can be simpler than that to make a lot of money. Now it is time they spend some of that back into the country they gained from.

I guess Saudis know what we know and we know what they now know and we also know what they don't know that they think they know.

2007-01-13 23:01:09 · answer #2 · answered by Nightrider 7 · 0 0

wow. you're completely misinformed approximately how the government works. i don't blame you by way of fact the media (the two liberial and conservative lie). a million. Romney can not make abortion unlawful. the U. S. proper courtroom has mentioned that abortion is a marvelous. the only thank you to make abortion unlawful is a Constitutional modification (ie 3/4 of the states could agree... meaning Romeny (or any President) can not do something approximately it. 2. Romney can not illegalize gay marriage. gay Marriage or marriage customarily is a state situation. the only the Romney can do as President is help DOMA (shielding of Marriage Act signed by utilising bill Clinton) which in certainty says the federal government does not could regonize gay marriage and states do not could properly known gay marriage of different states. Romney can not make gay marriage unlawful. 3. Romney can not take delivery administration off insurance regulations. insurance companies are private agencies and could have the capacity to grant in spite of insurance they want. even with the undeniable fact that, with the aid of legistation (ie a million/2 +a million of the homestead, and a million/2 +a million of the Senate, and the President signature) can regulate what insurance can and can't do. regularly regulation is approximately what agencies can not do extremely than what they could do. 4. Fundalmentalist Conservatives (like the Catholic Church) who're against delivery administration are additionally against viagra, and regularly all different way of inhibiting or convalescing reproductive well-being. by way of fact the toddler has basically a marvelous to be conceived certainly by utilising a married father and mom as in keeping with the choose of the their LORD. So a real conservative might additionally limit viagra. 5. delivery administration limit and viagra has greater to do with insurance companies making a earnings than with conserative or liberal values. 6. those are the realities our of equipment that the President does not relatively have the all controlling capacity that we've self assurance (or is hyped) them to have.

2016-12-16 04:18:55 · answer #3 · answered by marianna 4 · 0 0

well maybe because the world dont need your help!!!!!!!!!!!

sending soldiers make situation just worst!!!!

and about money dont worry, -you get more than you give-

and why you dont ask how many lives is your soldiers take??!!

you pres. do this just to show how amer. is big and powerful country!!

2007-01-13 23:13:07 · answer #4 · answered by marie 2 · 0 1

It is good question but I think it should be addressed to Mr bush.Leave the world live the way he prefer !

2007-01-14 00:58:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I guess other countries are fortunate enough not to have an amoral president like we have.

2007-01-13 22:46:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers