In approximately 5 years when the USA, Canada, and Mexico form the United States of North America, what will be the advantages and disadvantages?
Will Social Security and other federal pensions (such as military) be honored?
Will this provide the USNA sufficient oil reserves to wean us from Middle East Oil?
Would this be the only way to clean up the corruption of the Mexican government and way of life?
Will the USNA then get serious about stopping illegal immigration from Other Than Mexican (OTM) countries?
Will it be a good thing or bad thing to form the USNA?
2007-01-13
21:53:22
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
Is it treason to advocate the formation of the USNA?
Did the European Economical Union help or hurt Europe?
2007-01-13
21:54:42 ·
update #1
I cannot see any benefits. For an economic union to succeed the requisite is the similarity of the economies of the respective members. Mexican corruption and poverty preclude success. We must wait till the US reaches the same level, as we are destined to under this administration's policies, before such plans are put into effect.
2007-01-13 22:02:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by emiliosailez 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
It would be bad for Canada and the US who would be paying to bring up the schools and services of Mexico at the expense of schools and services in the US, much as rampant illegal immigration ruins our schools today, only much worse, much faster.
We need other fuels, so forget the oil part.
And our illegal immigration from 'other' parties is really minimal compared to our illegal immigration from Mexico, as I understand it.
And as to the EU, you do notice that the French and Dutch resoundingly voted DOWN the constitution, and that other countries approving it did not give citizens the vote. It depends on if you are a draining country or a being drained country whether it is good for you.
2007-01-14 02:20:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by DAR 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
confident, that's talked approximately as the North American Union (the NAU), and the forex would be talked approximately as the Amero, google it, they even have the money waiting designed for while they intentionally reason the greenback to break down. And no, I relatively do not help it, merely like i don't settle for the ecu. that's going to be a one occasion equipment, merely like Europe and China. "ability corrupts, absolute ability corrupts honestly" to grant much greater ability to an excellent smaller team of human beings is merely insanity. EDIT: "i_am_evolving" is sturdy approximately each thing, aside from the NWO being ineffective- far from it. The "Illuminati" have been utilising u.s. and England to convey create a sparkling international Order simply by fact the top of the 2d international conflict. Do you relatively think of they are going to easily provide up on the final hurdle simply by fact of a few Canadian protesters? If Canada knows of the NAU, then they are going to easily discover yet otherwise around it. that's like announcing the ecu is ineffective simply by fact the human beings of France and Holland voted no on the ecu shape. they only renamed it to Lisbon Treaty and pushed it via with none referendums- aside from eire who they tried to bully into balloting 'confident'. eire voted 'no' besides, even even though it makes no difference, simply by fact they are merely enacting each thing that selection into interior the Lisbon Treaty as a load of guy or woman rules. The elites in the back of this could give up at not something, you will properly confirm of that.
2016-10-19 23:14:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That won't happen here without bloody conquest. Unlike the european, Americans pride themselves on independence and uniqueness. Remember also that we get far more of our oil from south America than the middle east already, so I dont know where you get we need to wean ourselves off their oil.
And NOTHING is going to clean up Mexico's gov't. Self-destruction is their destiny, and the further the USA gets from that train wreck, the better off the USA will be.
2007-01-13 22:13:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
N.A.F.T.A. HURT US MORE THAN ANYTHING.
AND I DONT THINK WE WILL MERGE ANYWAY,
WE HAVE PRESIDENT, MEXICO HAS PRESIDENTE,
AND DONT KNOW WHAT CANADA HAS, PROBABLY
FRENCH SPEAKING MAN.
THAT WOULD BE THE BIG PROBLEM CAUSE WE WONT
LISTEN TO ANYONE BUT OUR ELECTED PRESIDENT
2007-01-13 22:04:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by sharma 4
·
0⤊
0⤋