It was announced by a team of scientists at the Roslin Institute near Edinburgh, Scotland, that for the first time an adult mammal has been successfully cloned by anyone. The procedure is simple enough that it would be easy for a human being now to be cloned. This means that the genetic material from a person could be easily obtained and inserted into an ovum from which the genetic material has been removed and that ovum now would behave like a fertilized egg and could develop, when implanted into a womb, into a person with the exact genetic makeup of the person from which the material was obtained--a clone. No fertilization by a male with different genetic makeup would be necessary. The issues are whether such cloning of humans should be allowed and if so, what are the biologic and ethical implications of such cloning.
2007-01-14 17:32:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by pradeep 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Please tell me which you're joking. A living being is a soul. it would be ineffective and not using a spirit given from God. it is that straightforward. Cloning mammals, even with the undeniable fact that, is nearly impossible and constantly a bad thought. The cloned animal has different well-being issues, if it survives, and no count how youthful it is, it dies relating to an identical time as its ensure does. If a 40 12 months previous guy gets cloned and dies at eighty of previous age, his clone is probable to die in his 40s.
2016-12-16 04:17:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by marianna 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you have partialy answered your question yourself. Cloning would be beneficial to mankind provided the Cloning Technology for Humans - once sufficiently developed remains in the hands of Good people and not passed on to people with evil intent .
2007-01-13 21:51:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cloning will be expensive enough that only people who are wealthy will be able to afford it. To that, I add "Thank God". Poor people are poor because of their own irresponsibility, and rich people are rich for their wisdom. Rich people will use this technology properly, to extend their lifespan to centuries. While generations of the lumpen unwashed are paved over by time, The Rich will live on, benefiting the world with their specialness.
2007-01-13 20:28:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
cloning of humans is rather waste coz we r already facing the problem of rising population.as far as organ cloning is considered it will be beneficial as it can save one's life.
2007-01-13 20:34:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by nishi s 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
imagine you have 10 mother 10 father you will do what? ok you can divide your husband with 2ou3 clone of you it is not posible alore it is where the god in this history jacaa from france
2007-01-13 22:03:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by jaacaa7793 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
it has merits and demerits.
the main merit of this is that we can make artificially kidneys , hearts etc. this will help the persons who were affected by heart diseases , kidney diseases etc to reinstall with new ones
The demerit is that charector of the hhuman being formed by this method may be nt similar with that of normal humanbeing
2007-01-13 20:37:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
comparing dynamite and cloning !! no sir
2007-01-14 00:43:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by david j 5
·
0⤊
0⤋