If islamic people are strictly against terrorists like osama why dont you openly condemn them ?

Question

as you did condemn the potraits of mohammed ?

Answer 1

Various Muslims *have* in fact condemned the 9/11 attacks. It's important to note that it can be appropriate to condemn acts without condemning the people responsible. Christians are taught as well to condemn the sin and not the sinner.

Answer 2

This has its own meaning If you study the life of Osama from the starting you can judge by yourself.

I can only say that When Osama was fighting in Afghanistan with the support of American against the forces of Russia he was a Hero, and same when he was against the policies of America he was a Terrorist. When Saddam was fighting with Iran with the support of America he was a Hero and when he resisted and gone against America he was a Terrorist and Mass killer. Nowadays America and its allies are the supreme authority for deciding A Hero and a Terrorist

Answer 3

Alhamdulilah i am a muslimand i can answer u very well from islamic point of view
Brother actually in Islam if u make fun of any Prophet weather it is Muhammad(P.B.U.H) ' Jesus (P.B.U.H) or Mosses(P.B.U.H)' making fun of any prophet in this way yhe punishment for it is DEATH.
And if a person kills another person according to Islam his punishment is also death but Osama did not kill one person he killed thousands so a according to Islam he must be killed so many times is'nt it brother?
So the men who made the portraits of Muhammad(P.B.U.H) were nbot given ANY PUNISHMENT therefor our anger rose up but did america not kill hundreds of thousnads just in the means of killing Osama so if u talk about condemning Osama thereis no need of it what u have already done and there are very less chances actually that Osama is still alive.
And one thing more i will say is that you say that Osama was responsible for 9/11 thsi was just a HYPOTHESIS and not a fact!
and america attacked Afghanistan just on the basis of this HYPOTHESIS and if u wanna go with HYPOTHESIS then there are so many clues that GEORGE BUSH himself planned it by the means of attacking Afghanistan.

Answer 4

We do! I just condemned him in your last question.

The reason for a stronger voice between our condemnation of Bin Laden and Prophet Mohammad is simple. There are thousands of terrorists but there is none like our Prophet Mohammad. They are not on the same scale.

Answer 5

We did and we always do !!!

But your media would not let you to listen to that !!!

BTW why are u expecting everything from muslims only?? Don't you think that christains should condemn American attacks on muslims and jews should condemn Killing muslims in palestine?
and still Hindus should condemn whts going on in India??

And again we don't believe that muslims are responsible for 9/11 attacks, it was inside job !

Answer 6

http://www.muhajabah.com/otherscondemn.php

We have. You're not listening. Just as nobody was listening when we marched in Washington in March against terror. No news networks bothered covering it. That link leads to hundreds of condemnations, fatwas, and the march.

Answer 7

They are busy bashing on the west for "misunderstanding" the "real" islam.. while other imams are busy to preach and teach terrorists for future missions . no matter how you say, islam has to change, and the world governments must change it by all kind of means. because currently Islam is not religion, it is a cult of hatred.

Answer 8

Outrage created by the news.

Answer 9

i think youv`e lost the plot there mate
lie down and have a nice rest

Answer 10

Because secretly they are all at home rooting for the terrorists! Sure to our faces they tell us what we want to hear, but behind closed doors they praise them!