What is some proof?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Agw5OtQc.G.Xcy1ZVSENTy_sy6IX?qid=20070102161110AAZ0pK0
And
Does it change with new facts (like REAL science does), because the Bible/Tora/Qu'ron (supposably) havn't changed since they were written.
2007-01-13 15:53:00 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
evolution is a science, creationism is a belief
2007-01-13 15:57:26 · answer #1 · answered by pba_ams_eahb 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
True science always supports the Biblical doctrines, especially Special Creation and the Genesis Flood. For evidence see the resources listed below. The hypothesis of evolution is also a belief system, in which it takes far more faith to believe than Special Creation and the Genesis Flood
2007-01-14 00:01:38 · answer #2 · answered by utuseclocal483 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It is just as much of a science as evolution is. Niether of them should be considered science but if you're going to consider nonsensical things like evolution as science then I want a more realistic idea like Intelligent Design to be considered as well.
2007-01-14 01:02:47 · answer #3 · answered by Frank Edwards 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're not sciences. They start as beliefs, and then look to the surrounding world to try to find evidence that aligns with those beliefs, or they'll interpret the evidence in the light of their beliefs. Real science starts with observation, then a theory is made and it's put to the test to pass or fail. Scientists don't hold to a belief they're trying to prove, which just drives the religious folk nuts. They think that's godless, which it's really not. It's objective.
2007-01-13 23:59:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
The Bible wrote about dinosaurs before science did...way before...in fact the foolish religious people that the haters talk about in here are so dumb that they built The Great Pyramids that our great scientist cant even figure out how they built them or even how fast the built them....scientist are only as smart as they think they are...and even though they didnt believe in God...they were still religous...
2007-01-13 23:59:55 · answer #5 · answered by Jordan_4u 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, because the origin of life cannot be demonstrated scientifically. There is NO scientific explanation for the origin of life. There is no scientific evidence.
Evolution is the best idea anyone can come up with to explain the origin of life without God, but it is hardly science. There is no science involved. It is just a crackpot theory proposed by a fool who thought his great, great, great grandfather was a monkey.
2007-01-14 00:08:57 · answer #6 · answered by iraqisax 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I don't even think there's that many Christians dumb enough to think it's a science. This is merely a defensive tactic employed by Christan's who see science as an opposing force.
2007-01-13 23:59:26 · answer #7 · answered by 2 fast 4 god 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Just because it hasn't changed, doesn't mean it's right. Do you know how long people thought the earth was flat? That didn't make it right. And no, it isn't real science.
2007-01-13 23:56:15 · answer #8 · answered by Nyara 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No. ID/Creationism is not a science. Like it or not, science depends on materialism and doubt.
2007-01-14 00:04:10 · answer #9 · answered by NONAME 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
They're trying real hard to make them sciences, but no, they'll never be anything but fairy tales and folklore.
2007-01-13 23:58:27 · answer #10 · answered by link955 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋