Why do many Christians think that long hair on a man is a sin?

Question

It a natural phenomenon just as balding. Would bald men wear wigs if it were sinful to be bald.

Answer 1

Wow does this bring back memories...when I USED to go to church, I took my boyfriend, who had long hair because he is Native American, and boy did he get stared at and talked about. Alot of people just shook their heads and gave him the pity look. Jackasses!

Answer 2

Christians who think that long hair on a man is a sin are just people who are overly nit-picky about appearances. And it gives them confidence to pick on people and be judgmental so that they are distracted from their own internal flaws and superficiality. They can think they are better than everyone if their hair is perfectly coiffed, nails perfectly manicured, lawn 2.5" tall. If they can judge people by their appearance, they can save a lot a time when deciding who to hate. They don't have to actually take the time to see anything good about the person. They can say, "he has long hair. He can't be in our special clique." If bald people were ostracized and seen as sinful, they might wear wigs just so they could fit in society, be able to get a job. In their hearts, they should realize it is not sin to be bald or have long hair. A long time ago, maybe men were not supposed to have long hair because it would get in the way of dangerous work they did. Maybe women were not supposed to be able to move about quickly so it was seen they should be burdened by heavy locks of hair. It is so weird that people think hair length is a sin.

Answer 3

I'm a Christian and I do not think long hair on a man is a sin.

Furthermore, it's is not a natural phenomenon "just as balding"

Answer 4

I think that's crazy to think that way. I think the only thing that could account for that is if it was a matter of pride and the person thought that their hair was something to be jealous about. Just having long hair though is nothing sinful as long as it is properly groomed.

Answer 5

I don't know if it's a sin but they may be thinking of the following passage from the scriptures (King James Version quoted)

1 Corinthians 11:14
Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?

Hope that helps

Answer 6

We do not think that long hair is a sin. No where in the Bible does it say that long hair is sin. Jesus had long hair, Samson had long hair. The only people that were required to have short hair were the harlots who had to shave their heads and wear a head covering. so if anything long hair would be good.

Answer 7

risky subject rely -- human beings nonetheless debate it. And in case you in basic terms yank the verses out of any context, they look very emphatic and sparkling... yet are not quite somewhat as sparkling as they look. Paul's writing a letter to the Corinthian church, culled from secular society, and he's making an attempt to set a baseline for what the church ought to look as though while placed against secular society. (no longer something has yet been prevalent.) So Paul's admonition ought to be framed against the secular pratices of the day, the magnitude interior the form of existence of short hair for ladies (i.e., social context), and so on. he's putting a time-honored as a fashion to cut back confusion interior the newly prevalent church. "Hell-deserving" sin has little to do with it; he's in basic terms arguing from human reason and accepted religious precendence right here. He desires to entice a seen distinction between adult males and girls folk, as properly as between pagan worshippers / prostitutes and girls folk. [occasion: women folk answerable for adultery, as an occasion, generally had their hair shorn. Temple prostitutes generally had their heads shaved. Paul desires to ward off sending that contextual sign... such as the reality that, whether the logo later stated as a swastika existed long earlier Hitler, no person makes use of it those days via fact it quite is become contextually linked to the Nazis.] all of us understand that v14 wasn't a right away-around the board condemnation of long hair on adult males -- the Nazarites (?) have been a sect the place no longer reducing one's hair become a demonstration of devotion to God. (Samson interior the OT become a kind of.) Paul knew this, as a strict practitioner of the regulation, so it colorings how we examine the hair admonition. [observe: We additionally are not given a definition of what "long" and "short" is -- all all of us understand is that "short" is "shorter than long," and vice versa. If hair legalism become the factor, then an genuinely length could have been given, top?] besides, in case you do a sprint diagnosis, you may uneasily come across greater of the Roman way of existence of that factor and how that hair length / exposure become seen in that way of existence. at the same time as some circulate with a greater remoted interpretation of the verse(s), to me, social context is a effective argument and makes the main experience.

Answer 8

Lol, I don't care how long your hair is. God looks at the heart.

This reminds me of a situation I was in yesterday. I was at Guitar Center and the guy at the counter was totally "punked out." Tattoos, spiky hair, etc. He was really helpful and informative though. Then he pulled out his thermos and says to me, "I've really gotten hooked on chamomile. But I like earl gray too. Which do you like better?" I laughed and said they were both good.

Just goes to show you that appearance doesn't mean anything.

G.B.

Answer 9

I wouldn't say "many." In fact, I don't know any Christians who think that. And since when is hair a phenomenon?

Answer 10

It's not.
But Paul speaks of it, saying that a man with long hair is shameful, but that was just his opinion from the first century. It was to those living then, but to us, it's not a bad thing for a man to have longer hair.