You left yourself open to that cr@p mainworry is writing. He quotes the bible as scientific evidence. This just shows how little they understand
2007-01-13 12:26:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nemesis 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Bacteria that are resistant to specific drugs represent a variety that becomes dominant. This is an example of survival of the fittest. Within every species, there is variation.
When Europeans came to America, they brought diseases that the Indians hadn't encountered. Some of these diseases ran rampant through the Indian populations, killing the majority of them. A few of the Indians developed milder cases of the disease, in some cases, never came down with it.
These survivors now constituted the remnant of the tribe. Did the Indians in that tribe "evolve" to develop an immunity to the disease? Of course not. Only those individuals who had some degree of immunity survived. Their descendants had this immunity.
It is the same for bacteria. Those strains which survive the drug are the fittest, and they survive to become the dominant strain.
Why do I have to continue to explain this simple high school biology? This is nothing new.
2007-01-13 22:07:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by iraqisax 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
And what evidence do u have that there isent a god that created you through evolution? Catholics belive in evolution as a meens that god used to create you and me. I don't know why people don't accept the fact that all the evidence points out that evolution is a viable theory. Though not a fact and it cannot be proven because it cant be reproduced in a lab with controlls just like the big bang will always be a theory because it cant be reproduced under controlled circumstances.
2007-01-13 20:25:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Catholic_18 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
The introduction to Genesis and to the whole Bible ascribes everything to the living God, creating, making, acting, moving, and speaking. There is no room for evolution without a flat denial of Divine revelation. One must be true the other false. All of God’s works are good, great, wondrous, and perfect.
Man starts from nothing. He begins in helplessness, ignorance, and inexperience. All his works, therefore, proceed on the principle of evolution. This principle is only seen in human affairs: from the hut to the palace; from the canoe to the ocean liner; from the spade to the plowshare to machines. But the birds build their nests today as at the beginning. There is growth and development within man, but no passing, change, or evolution out from one into another.
For this theory or fallacy of evolution to be true there would be evident stages of evolution today. You would be able to find species in many stages of evolution in nature right now. For this theory or fallacy of evolution to be true there would be no God. And that’s exactly what evolutionists believe and are trying prove. The evolutionist bases his or her conclusions on human assumptions and reasoning, instead of on the documentary evidence of the manuscripts.
2007-01-13 20:22:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Science is over rated... Not really. sadly as a Catholic I can not offer you any evidence that evolution is false but I can offer you evidence that Creationism is not totaly false...
If you will read my apologetic you will see a rational arguement for Creo-evolutionism http://www.geocities.com/patrickmaloney26/How.html
I deny nothing but simply state that science proves that anything is possible.
2007-01-13 20:32:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Patrick M 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Time.
Prove anything over about 5500 years old. Don't repeat speculation, show your work. You can not find any dinosaur bone that can be dated over 5500 years and verified. Prove time. The earth is supposed to be 4.5 byo, show some evidence. The very thing you need is time-you don't have it. Without millions and billions of years-no evolutionary line of thinking will stand. Show me the time!
2007-01-13 20:27:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Desperado 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Evolution is a religion that takes a lot of faith.
2007-01-13 20:30:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Fish <>< 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Disproving evolution doesn't make Creation correct, nor does disproving Creation make Evolution correct.
If I said the sky was pink, you could provide evidence that it wasn't pink, but you didn't prove what color it really was.
INTERESTING, HMMM!!!?!?!??!111one
2007-01-13 20:25:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dr. Douche 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
evos are great cars!
2007-01-13 20:23:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋