who should own the rights to the name BUD , the Czechs or Americans. What is the history behind the law suit?

Answer 1

As much as it pains me to say it, the name Budweiser rightfully belongs to the American company Anheuser-Busch. Here is a little history courtesy of Wikipedia:
Anheuser-Busch started using the Budweiser brand in 1876 and registered it two years later -- more than 19 years before Budejovicky Budvar (brewer of Budvar) was established in 1895. It was not until the 1960s that Budvar started using “Budweiser” prominently on its label – long after A-B built Budweiser into an internationally recognized name for beer.

The Czech company contends that its history, and thus its claim to the Budweiser name, goes back even further. They say that King Otakar II of Bohemia granted independent brewers in the city of Budweis the right to produce beer as early as 1265. They did so in a style that became known as "Budweiser," much as beers brewed in the fashion of another Czech city, Plzeň (German: Pilsen), are referred to as "Pilsner", the company says.

Since both Budějovický Budvar and Anheuser-Busch have trademarks for the name "Budweiser", they have been party to many lawsuits in a number of countries.

Because of trademark disputes between Budejovicky Budvar and Anheuser-Busch, Budvar is sold in the United States under the label "Czechvar". In other countries, both companies still compete for the right to use the Budweiser name. There are over 40 lawsuits currently being argued and appealed in countries around the world.

In early 2007, Anheuser-Busch and Budvar reached an agreement that stated that A-B would market Budvar/Czechvar in the United States and several other countries for an undisclosed fee. However, both sides stated that this did not affect their lawsuits.

You can read the entire by clicking on the link below. Hope this helps!

Answer 2

Americans, we won the war

Answer 3

The Americans...they are the rightfull owners!

Answer 4

dosent a canadian company called Labatt's own the bud name now so should be canadian rights