2007-01-13 03:54:34 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I am not thrilled nor impressed with our President. According to him in like 2003 or so, "THE WAR IS OVER!" Then why the HECK do we still have soliders over there? WHY are we losing MORE people NOW than we did THEN?! My husband could go over there, and for what?! I really want us out of there ASAP. Longer we stay, the more deaths we are going to have, more mourning families. I do NOT want to hear that my husband has died because of this mess! I think we keep what we have, and slowly send them HOME! I know that the soldier's morale is probably dropping fast, but sending more over isn't gonna help anything. BRING THEM HOME!
2007-01-13 04:19:03 · answer #1 · answered by Crazy 4 Cats! 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is a worse mistake than invading Iraq was!
It is not the duty or responsibility of this otherwise great country of ours to resolve the differences between the Kurds, Sunnis, and the Shitties that have existed for the last 1,500 years and to try to have them live in peace!
Only an idiot with no education or brains would think it is!
If the people of Iraq can not resolve their own problems let them go down the tubes like many other countrys have during the course of world history! - this should not be our business!
We have way too many problems here at home to resolve!
2007-01-13 12:02:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Stupid........what's the purpose?? The entire region is becoming increasingly involved in the Iraqi civil war and I see no need for more American life to be lost. We have already lost more American life in Iraq than we did on 9/11. We have not prevented another 9/11; we have caused another one. Enough is enough!
2007-01-13 12:11:43 · answer #3 · answered by txwebber 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He really dont want to put more sodiers there but he should do it to correct his mistakes not once but more than this. So he will.
But the question is what is the advantage of sending more troops to Iraq?
2007-01-13 12:16:31 · answer #4 · answered by Jalse 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is nothing more than a repeat of Johnson's escalation in Nam during the '60s, it is even accompanied by the same rhetoric. It didn't work then, I see no reason to believe it will work now.
2007-01-13 12:36:48 · answer #5 · answered by rich k 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Way too little, and far too late. If he's not prepared to double the number of ground troops -- and that's what it will take -- just bring them home.
2007-01-13 12:05:35 · answer #6 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think the more important question is "what is their mission?" We can send in all the troops we want but if their not accomplishing anything what good is it?
2007-01-13 12:02:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
What's to think. It is going to happen, maybe not enough. The thing we need to do is kick out the reporters, and get the job done.
2007-01-13 12:02:02 · answer #8 · answered by B aka PE 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i dont think its going to help one bit. we never shouldve gone there to begin with...
i think that the troops need to come home asap, before anymore of them get killed
2007-01-13 12:17:07 · answer #9 · answered by ♥charlies angel♥ 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
his best move yet.. w/ moving more troops in he can now secure spots that troops could only potrol w/ this the terrorist/insurgens can not tourture the civilians into not talking. and we can get the job done faster BRAVO BUSH!
2007-01-13 12:08:25 · answer #10 · answered by question man 911 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋