Why do you think the origin of life has anything to do with whether o r not evolution is accurate. After all, couldn't an intelligent designer have created the first cell and let things go from there?
2007-01-13 01:48:14 · 11 answers · asked by mullah robertson 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
So far, nobody has provided a decent reason of why the two should be linked. Even if you think (or could prove) that God created life, that says nothing about what form he created it in or what has happened to ist since.
2007-01-13 02:04:21 · update #1
That is absolutely true. The probability of abiogenesis is only relevant in that it lends support to a deistic view of evolution.
2007-01-13 01:53:13 · answer #1 · answered by NONAME 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A biogenesis is the field of science dedicated to studying how life might have arisen for the first time on the primordial young Earth. Despite the enormous progress that has been made since the Miller-Urey experiment, abiogenesis is under constant attack from creationists, who continually claim that the origin of life by natural processes is so unlikely as to be, for all practical purposes, impossible.
2007-01-13 01:54:42 · answer #2 · answered by Tank Stillton 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The beginning place of organic and organic lifestyles from inorganic count at present fails to be defined by utilising naturalists and scientists alike. Its a commerce secret that they are not even close, with innovations like "it befell on the returned of crystals" being the right they have arise with. it is not outstanding, as lifestyles varieties incorporate genetic concepts of the optimal order of complexity. The "first regulation of concepts" says that concepts constantly comes from an clever source. it is probable the explanation at the back of the "regulation of Biogenesis", that lifestyles constantly comes from lifestyles. The argument that organic and organic evolution isn't concerning abiogenesis is a enormous copout. If "beginning place of Species" does not conceal the beginning place of the 1st species, then the thought has no initiate and is subsequently ineffective in the water. Miller's test is particularly in maximum biology text textile books in the financial ruin of evolution. the familiar concept of Evolution is the all encompassing concept of organic history from vast Bang to as we communicate to describe origins with out God. This needless to say contains the beginning place of lifestyles (aboigenesis) situation. "Now i'm no biologist " - thrilling admission.
2016-12-16 03:37:32 · answer #3 · answered by suire 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
FROM ADAM IN EDEN ALL THE DETAILS STAND BUT NOT BEFORE ADAM
EXCEPT OR REJECT JESUS GENEALOGY AND 2007 CALENDAR TIME
~~~~ Gen.1:1,2 All Exist. 1:3-25 Earth prepared. Space Job 38:30-32;
0130 Adam Gen.5:3
0105 Shem Gen.5:6
0090 Enos Gen.5:9
0070 Cainan Gen.5:12
0065 Mahalaleel Gen.5:15
0162 Jared Gen.5:18
0065 Enoch Gen.5:21
0187 Methusalen Gen.5:25
0182 Lamech Gen.5:28; 1056 Noah born.
0600 age of Noah, Flood Gen.7:6; 1656 flood year at 1656 after Adam.
0000 Noah 350 years Gen.9:28,29; Shem 502 years Gen.11:10,11,
0222 Gen.11:10,11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22,24 is Terah at, 222 years.
0205 427 Gen.11:32 [ 205 dies ]; Gen.12:4; Abraham age 75. Matt.1:1-17;
0430 857 Exo.7,7; 12:40,41; Gal.3:16-18 [ Abraham & 430 to law ];
0040 897 Num.33:38,39 [ Deut.34:7 Aaron & Moses die ];
0000 898th after flood. Josh.5:6,10,12; 14th day of New Year.
0000 Judges 11:26; 300 & 898 after flood, is 1198. 1212 BC
0000 Acts 13:20 450 & 857 is 1307 after flood. 1103 BC
0000 1Ki.2:10,11 David [ 1037 BC ]. Ruth 4:18-22; 1Chr.3:1-17;
0480 1Ki.6:1; Promised Land 897 to 1377 after flood. 1033 BC
0036 1Ki.11:42 Solomon dies 1413 after flood. 997BC
3069 & 997 & 2007 is 6073 after Adam as LOST to SAVED.
0000 Rev.20:6; 1000 year reign of Jesus. 1000 is 7072 years accounted for.
NOT AGE OF EARTH.
2007-01-13 03:05:22 · answer #4 · answered by jeni 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well the bible does say humans were made in god's image - if they evolved from other animals that doesnt make much sense.
Why should we bend over backwards for these ignorant people? Cells werent made by an 'intelligent designer'.
God doesnt exist.
2007-01-13 02:04:19 · answer #5 · answered by TRITHEMIUS 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
intelligent design is just a way christians try to bring god into science and it has failed all over the world god is not real a fairy tale the cristians are control freakes
2007-01-13 01:55:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
People deny evolution so the rest of their beliefs and their security in "knowing" how everything is isn't shaken. They think that if something evolves, there CAN'T be a creator, and that would bother them so much because it means they have to relearn everything. Fundamentalism is built on insecurity.
2007-01-13 01:54:14 · answer #7 · answered by Danagasta 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I imagine it's because it lets them play with numbers, which makes them feel like they're doing real science.
2007-01-13 01:51:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
How did that very first life form come into existence, since it had no other life to evolve from? Life can't evolve from non-life.
HINT: God created it!
2007-01-13 01:53:55 · answer #9 · answered by Born Again Christian 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Sure if you are a deist.
2007-01-13 01:54:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋