2007-01-12 16:04:35 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
THIS SITE HAS THE STATS
http://members.aol.com/usregistry/allwars.htm
2007-01-12 16:10:38 · answer #1 · answered by strike_eagle29 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My war, Operation Desert Storm. The mission was largely unknown, and there was an expectation we would be bogged down and take a lot of casualties. With sufficient preparation and overwhelming firepower though, we smashed the Iraqi forces and suffered very very few casualties. Having a clear, defined end point and exit strategy enabled us to leave with our heads held high, the current Iraq conflict is more difficult and will require a virtual steamrolling of the country to crush the fighting before we can leave. We may never truly leave the middle east (Iraq) for the forseable future.
2007-01-13 00:28:19 · answer #2 · answered by togetheradecade 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since the Korean war was deemed a Police Action and the Viet Nam war was deemed a Conflict, I would have to say the French and Indian War had the fewest casualties, but that is my opinion
2007-01-13 00:14:33 · answer #3 · answered by gyro-nut64 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, Clinton's war against the Serbs had no American casualties, but the Albanians lost over 10,000 citizens (Men -women -and children) because the Serbs were allowed to run rampant in Kosovo. It seems, Clinton wouldn't allow American troops in to corral the Serbs and send them running back to Serbia with their tails between their legs. Instead they were allowed to kill and torture Albanians along the way because there wasn't anyone else to challenge their hideous behavior.
This is the legacy the democrats have given America, this and the war in Vietnam. These slimy, evil people believe they have the right to govern this country of ours with a legacy such as this? I think not!
2007-01-13 00:32:36 · answer #4 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The war with the fewest casualties where combat has actually taken place was the Gulf War/Operation Desert Storm (1991).
2007-01-13 00:12:15 · answer #5 · answered by Michael C 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
We won the "Cold War" and as far as I know there were very few casualties in that one. Though, it was more of a political war and not a conventional one.
2007-01-13 00:09:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Quasi war: 62. 1798-1800
2007-01-13 00:08:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are more than one. All those wars in which the enemy was so week, that U.S. had no casualties.
2007-01-13 00:44:43 · answer #8 · answered by robertonereo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
anytime that one solider loses his life fighting for our country then I considered this a casualtie. But if I were guessing I would say that it was the Korean War.
2007-01-13 00:13:16 · answer #9 · answered by karen v 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The Gulf War (Operation Desert Storm).
4 casualites.
All of them friendly fire.
2007-01-13 00:14:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋