is bush making a mistake about sending troops???
2007-01-12 15:50:32 · 14 answers · asked by Kasey 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
do we really need to send more people in the war and is hanging sadam n his parners in crime enough???
2007-01-16 11:57:58 · update #1
Of course. Everything Little Georgie has done has been a failure. C- student, the bust of Midland Oil, destroying the Texas Rangers baseball franchise, governor of Texas, and now he's driven us into unbelievably deep debt, and gotten us involved in another VietNam. But he doesn't remember the mistakes of VietNam, for he was too busy partying in Alabama while others were serving their country in S.E. Asia. Every one of the neo-cons opted out of military service, yet they're the first ones to send others sons and daughters off to fight their personal little war with Saddam, who threatened Little Prez-ee-dent Nuke-ya-ler's daddy, when Poppy Bush was to visit Kuwait some years back after he was mercifully voted out of office.
He needs to heed the saying "Those who ignore history are condemned to repeat it."
2007-01-12 16:05:41 · answer #1 · answered by avranesjr 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
that's not a protection, that's declaring the hypocrisy of the main appropriate. particularly, that Bush did plenty worse issues that did not look to problem the main appropriate on the time, yet Obama's comparable (and oftentimes plenty smaller) infractions are met with a decision to armed revolt. in element of certainty, i'm previous indignant with the Obama administration, and that i could be fantastic with impeachment complaints based on the abuse of drone technologies, and what I see simply by fact the unconstitutional extension of the Patriot Act. i don't particularly care that the main appropriate is hounding Obama, different than that i don't have faith that if Romney had gained the presidency and have been doing the precise same issues, the main appropriate could say a notice, different than in his protection. So, the fast answer is that i don't have faith the main appropriate is truthful in its grievance of Obama - i think of that's particularly tactical, not ethical.
2016-10-19 22:08:51 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. I do know that this and similar questions are off the mark. The question needs to be, "How does America prosper safely in a global environment of violent anti-Americanism?" Until we get that question answered, the rest of the discussion is re-arranging deck chairs on the Titanic.
2007-01-20 05:37:09 · answer #3 · answered by byhisello99 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It has been argued right from the beginning of this conflict that not enough troops were being sent. Now, GWB is trying to correct that problem by adding troops to the current levels, thereby offering a better chance to win battles that were otherwise, a draw!
2007-01-12 16:40:27 · answer #4 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I have no idea. I can't see how we normal citizens could possibly know enough details to have an informed decision. It seems a reasonable bet, though, and with the experts in disagreement, I think it's better to go too big that too little.
2007-01-12 18:08:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
**** YA its wrong for him to send more of our men out there even my man is going pretty soon and no its not enough for them what they did was wrong in every catogory
2007-01-18 08:51:17 · answer #6 · answered by Monique 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pres. George W. Bush IS one big mistake.
2007-01-12 15:58:05 · answer #7 · answered by Karen H 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
President Bush does not make mistakes.
2007-01-12 16:26:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
This is a good question...
No I do not....It would be a mistake for the ones over there not to send them.....
2007-01-12 16:10:19 · answer #9 · answered by snickers 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush is a mistake
2007-01-12 15:54:18 · answer #10 · answered by lovefights 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋