English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do they wonder if they would have experienced more sensation if their bodies had been allowed to have remained as they were originally designed?

2007-01-12 15:40:32 · 14 answers · asked by Cynthia D 5 in Health Other - Health

14 answers

I don't resent it, but I have read that if you are uncircumsised there is more sensation. Sometimes I wonder if that is true, and if so, what that would be like.

2007-01-12 15:49:35 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

I think this is like asking someone if they miss not eating ice cream when in reality they have never had ice cream. . . there would ALWAYS be that wonderment.
I think that any man who has experienced both,not being circumcised verses being circumcised will tell you that they not only wish they could have been circumcised earlier in their lives but that given the chance to go back to being uncircumcised they would prefer to stay circumcised.
Most uncircumcised men experience alot of trouble with hygiene problems because urine can get trapped in the foreskin and combined with body heat,bacteria starts to grow.
When men are boys running around in the gym showers,alot of uncircumcised boys feel like they are different when they see the other boys that are circumcised as I would suspect that about 90% or more men are now adays circumcised right after birth and never know the difference until they see it.

2007-01-12 15:57:52 · answer #2 · answered by Just Q 6 · 0 0

I don't think so, and it is a proven fact that an uncircumsised penis kept clean does have more sensation and doesn't present a health concern at all.. Ask my friend he experienced both.
And the thing about the HIV thing in Africa is bull, sorry!
We all know that HIV is tranmitted through bodily fluids, and they are there whether circumsised or not.

2007-01-12 15:52:01 · answer #3 · answered by Mightymo 6 · 0 0

Actually, circumcision was thought to be more of a culturally inclined practice. It was a test of manhood and purity for some culture and religion.

Recently it was found out that it also has its benefits on hygiene. it prevents accumulation of smegma.

I think man who ave undergone circumcision have little resentment due to :
1. Lot of culture view circumcision as an act of manhood ... so being circumcised results to lesser teasing.
2. Sexually, the removal of the prepuce will bare the highly sensitive glans penis... so i think this will add more pleasure.

2007-01-12 15:49:53 · answer #4 · answered by ninety9percent_damaged 1 · 0 0

No, not at all. We're cleaner, leaner, and much more in demand.
In fact, the NIH (National Institute of Health) just released a study regarding how circumcision in Africa can reduce the HIV infection rate.

That's something to think about next time you " hook up."

2007-01-12 15:47:25 · answer #5 · answered by DixieNormus 4 · 0 0

How can one resent something if you can't remember the difference? Some people can find resentment in anything, but as for me, that is the last place I look for resentment.

2007-01-12 15:45:12 · answer #6 · answered by ___ 5 · 1 1

Not me, I've got a lot of sensation

2007-01-12 15:43:12 · answer #7 · answered by charles 3 · 0 1

Those men with a commitment to the spiritual life never do.

2007-01-12 15:43:26 · answer #8 · answered by Yellow Tail 3 · 0 1

no way!! Looks better circumcised, much less risk for infections, and getting circumcised as an adult is not fun at all. Life is much better for the circumcised male.

2007-01-12 15:43:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

you mean it's not supposed to look like this? Oh man some ones got some explaining to do.

2007-01-12 15:44:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers