Either. You can also call him "Deuce."
2007-01-12 14:14:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by pandjnewton 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
It depends is the father is a Jr., if not then the son would be a Jr. If the father is a Jr. it would II. Hope this helps
2007-01-12 22:14:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by yweller25 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
My ex's name is Phil and we called my son Phillip. When he applied for a job he used Phillip M B_____ Jr. on the application. A few years ago he wanted to be called Phil. He is 29. But that's up to the parents.
2007-01-12 22:17:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by lynnie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Either, but II is kinda more formal than jr.
2007-01-12 22:14:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Juan 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jr. It is II if the name skipped a generation (e.g., you are naming him after his grandfather).
2007-01-12 22:14:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by tertiahibernica 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
either/or, although second might also designate a second time a name was used for someone, not just a son being named after his father-such as if a father has two daughters and one of them has his grandson, she might name him after her father and use II. using II might preferable to keep the child's nickname from being "junior".
2007-01-12 22:59:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by jerseydevil67 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Either is fine, but i think Jr would be cool
2007-01-12 22:16:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Junior
but why would you? there are so many wonderful names in the world, you should go for something original or different to the family.
2007-01-12 23:39:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Fuzzy Wuzzy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
you could use either.
If you think they or you plan on carrying on the name. I would use the II and then III so forth
2007-01-12 22:14:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
either, normally though people use jr
2007-01-12 22:14:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ms Berry Picker 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jr.
2007-01-12 22:14:52
·
answer #11
·
answered by Finnis 2
·
0⤊
0⤋