no, it isn't a myth polar ice caps in the north pole melting and polar bears drowning
2007-01-12 11:56:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Unfortunately, global warming is a reality and it is mankind's responsibility to future generations to help control it by reducing our impact on the environment.
We add somewhere in the vicinity iof 700 tons per day of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere while allowing oxygen factories like rain-forests to be cleared at a rate of about 1000 acres/hour.
Humans cannot continue at these rates without devastating effects worldwide.
Additional comment:
The argument that global warming is a cyclic event has an argument in that there have been several ice ages throughout global history but it does appear by examination of ice core-samples that this event is much greater in scope than any ice cap recession of the past.
2007-01-12 12:04:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by ©2009 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, the polar bears are certainly on "thin ice" -- literally, not liberally :)
See, here's what I don't get about ignorant global warming deniers...
All the scientists and smart people want us to do about global warming is stop using fossil fuels (like the billions of barrels we import from the Middle East), and use fuels that don't emit so much carbon dioxide and other nasty waste products. We could switch all our cars and electric generating plants to ethanol within a couple of years -- it would be pretty easy. That ethanol would come from American farms (not the Middle East). No more dependence on foreign oil. Spending our money for energy in America instead of Saudia Arabia. A better economy supporting American industry and farmers instead of sending the money overseas. Cleaner air, less pollution, less carbon dioxide emissions (to reduce global warming)...and ethanol produced at home would be MUCH cheaper than foreign oil, so you'd pay less at the gas pump.
What's the downside? Why are you folks so dead-set against combatting global warming? Even if the science is wrong (it's not, but for the sake of argument...) -- what have you got to lose?
WHY are you against this???
2007-01-12 12:00:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I love your question.
Global warming is not a myth. Only the most stubborn of bad scientists who insist on forcing data to fit their theory will deny global warming now.
The questions come with what we do once we recognize it, and how far we want to take our own responsibility. I am a liberal, but quite honestly, I'm not sure that any of the liberal ideas about how to deal with the problem would ultimately do any good, even though they might make us feel better about it.
Warming and cooling of the Earth have been going on since there first was an Earth. We have all kinds of evidence of ice ages, global warming, mini-ice ages, watery tropical periods, all happening over the last four billion years. There are great cycles and long cycles, short cycles and mini-cycles, and lots of cycles within cycles.
There are lots of accountings for these things that are arrived at from the Earth's position relative to the Sun, core samples from ice, dirt, and rock, tree rings, etc., recorded records and statistics, archaeology, ancient writings and endless other sources.
Scientists of all sorts set up MODELS, based on statistical and other evidence, explaining global warming and predicting its future. They come up with an enormous variety of scenarios on what is going to happen, from the "Water world" end of the spectrum to the global super storm/ice age extreme.
I am a vegan, and am often in the middle of a perfectly ridiculous argument about whether plant eating animals or the plants themselves cause more greenhouse gasses. Anything can be approached irrationally.
So far what we have actually got in numbers is that the average temperatures everywhere on earth have gone up a few degrees in the past twenty years. The other thing we have seen is the destabilization of weather.
This is arguable, but I believe that the process of warming is speeding up.
Personally, I think that some of global warming and cooling is always due to geological changes as opposed to greenhouse gasses. For example, if land masses are in different positions with respect to the oceans, that is bound to affect warming and cooling currents in the air and in the oceans.
Do we stop greenhouse gasses? Even if it can't stop global warming? I think that can be simplified from a spurious ethical question to a practical aesthetic one: do we stop pollution in general? That's easy: no one wants to live in smog beside a foul smelling river, and have to look at rusting and rotting cars and buildings.
I guess that personallly I would like to do everything we can to slow down the process of warming, while we think about what to do when things change as radically as they probably will.
I like polar bears, because they are neither liberal nor conservative. I would like to be working on what can we do about the fact that eventually, no matter what position we take on the global warming, they are going to lose their habitat and their food supply. That is something we could do something about if we would stop arguing over questions that can never be answered.
2007-01-12 12:33:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Global warming is a fact - I don't think anyone disputes that. The debate is about how much of it is caused by us and how much is natural. I think we definitely need to look at how much we are causing it. Our government is the only one that denies we are contributing. Secondly, even if we are not causing it and it is a natural change - we need to fund the study of it. It would be in our countries best interest to know if we are going to lose coastal areas from flooding or if the top third of the country is going to be covered by glaciers (global warming may actually cause an ice age). We can't relocate population and economic centers overnight.
2007-01-12 12:00:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nah, it's the Hollow Earth people doing it. They vent the heat from the molted core of the planet to warm their gardens and houses. The heat naturally goes up and melts the polar ice caps. They have a publicist who then blames the polar bears. Unfortunately, the polar bears are drowning left and right, so soon they'll have to blame someone else. Hmmm, I wonder who else they could blame?
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Personally, I think what is happening to the earth is very natural and that the planet is moving into another ice age. First it will get hot then the ice will cover the planet, but I don't think it will happen in our lifetimes unless some doofus group of scientists try to intervene with their limited but appearingly brilliant genius and knock this natural event out of whack.
2007-01-12 12:02:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The earth is heating up. yet even if human beings are causing it truly is in reality open to communicate, even regardless of the reality that some activist-varieties insist in the different case. some scientists are focusing totally on the alleged human aspect, without pondering any of the different opportunities (e.g., higher image voltaic pastime - different planets in our image voltaic device are also experiencing documented "warming" traits). The earth emerged from an ice age zillions of years in the past, and now that is dealing with a warming section. It runs is cycles. most of the "scientists" who declare that human beings are responsible for global warming will let us know that "the earth's temperature will strengthen a million degree over the subsequent 50 years of we do not commerce in our SUV for a Prius... NOW!!!" high-quality, yet why received't they let us know how a lot the temperature will strengthen in, say, 5 years, after we will actual be round to work out in the journey that they are proper or not? you recognize the reason - because they don't recognize, and which will reason human beings to question their lengthy-time period predictions as well. summary - The earth is warming, yet no one has been waiting to coach what's causing it.
2016-11-23 14:58:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by schifano 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, it's a union of communist penguins.
The "Tuxedo Gang of Red Antarctica" has been promoting this myth for some time, trying to reduce industrialization and the use of combustion engines in order to further their plans to rule the world through waddling and nasal squawking.
2007-01-12 11:58:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, global warming is very real. See, if people don't stop driving these huge trucks and don't stop making these huge factories, things are going to get much, much worse.
2007-01-16 11:37:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
go watch al gores movie i mean its pretty simple global warming is real and the effects are being felt already ice caps are melting temps are rising
2007-01-12 11:57:22
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
there are arguements that our earth goes through these warming up and cooling down periods naturally..some think it has something to do with the amount of solar flare activity on the suns surface. however the recent increase in temperature as we have become industrialised proves to be quite compelling evidence for global warming taking place!
2007-01-12 11:56:46
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋