English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean he didnt, and peeps are all pissed about the war. If we pull out, against Bush's plan, what if there is a major terrorist attack on the US? And No, Bush isnt to blame.

2007-01-12 11:37:18 · 41 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

41 answers

A few reasons. Some people are still so pissed off about losing in 2000 they can't see beyond their anger and hatred.

Others blindly follow the far-left talking points.

Some are just stupid kids, spewing the BS they hear in school.

Still more will NEVER admit that Clinton screwed up and laid a lot of the groundwork for the situations we're now facing.

There are those who really hate America and were GLAD we got attacked - they ALWAYS blame Bush.

Finally, there's the people who insist on finding a conspiracy everywhere. Except, of course, the Clinton administration. These folks hear voices, see little green men, and wear tin foil hats.

Have a great evening

2007-01-12 11:43:28 · answer #1 · answered by Jadis 6 · 4 6

Why do you think you're smarter just because you say that he didnt do it?Its your opinion,its not a fact,same with the others who think that 9/11 was inside job.So, call them ignorant and stupid when you show a proof.Looking from their view i bet the ignorant and stupid one is Bush's supporter.
Now what makes me think that 9/11 was an inside job?I'll risk to look ignorant and stupid and will share it with you.Most of Western Europe was negotiating with Middle East (in particular Afghanistan and Iraq),to buy oil not for dollars but euro.Do you know what that means?It means a crash for the dollar and a total collapse for the U.S. empire.Plus the oil business that Bush's family has a hand on.He needed fast and effective way to change the power in some eastern countries and take the domination.And make them keep selling oil for dollars.He had to brainwash the world,so it all would look like a revenge or better a war against the terrorism.
Its time for the U.S. to stop playing world's cop,because I think the world paid enough.For having cheap gas,for having cheap immigrants,for having too much luxury,for ruling everywhere.....he needs to fight the "terrorism".
Bush doesnt care about the poor Iraqi people who used to suffer under Saddam's regime.Bush cares that the U.S. stays on the top.And people should stop believe that he is all humanistic....well,yes,he is doing all that for you,but still......out there are dying your husbands,your brothers,your friends.....Does it all worth?

2007-01-12 12:11:12 · answer #2 · answered by nitty : 2 · 1 1

Well maybe it has something to do with the Bush administration's lack of interest in the Palestine / Isreali peace process when he initially took office in 2000. At the time the Palestinians had great hope of actually receiving a fair deal due to Clintons insistance on fair dealing by Isreal. The Bush administration let the whole issue totally die which angered Arabs and the coozy relationship the Bush family had with the Suadis (Bin Laden is a Suadi and nearly all the terrorists on those planes were also suadis) allowed easy access into America. In short it was a result of neglect and pompus ignorance.

Don't forget that even after all that happened...Bush was ready to turnover our ports to Dubai.....a known supporter of Terrorism.

Bush may not be totally the cause for 911 but he sure didn't do anything to prevent it.....he merely gave them an opening!

In order to stop terrorist attacks on the US we must 1st answer the question as to why do extremists want to attack us in the first place. Hmmm....do your homework. These guys didn't just wake up and say lets attack them. It is the result of many decades of Americas aid in the oppression of Arabs and thier desire to strike back. We have a love affair with Arab Oil yet we arm and support thier biggest enemy ISREAL.

Now who are the guys we least want to grow in power in the middle east? IRAN! Iran is an Islamic fundamentalist state comprised of Shiite muslims. Guess who the Bush administration put in power in Iraq?? Yup Shiites! Go figure. Saddam Hussein was a Sunni muslim who advocate secular govenment. Beleive it or not Suddam Hussein had Christians, Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds in his cabinet. LOOK IT UP!

2007-01-12 12:09:02 · answer #3 · answered by Dr. Ackmadia 2 · 1 1

I'll tell you why. Because people love to have a "conspiracy theory." The CIA killed Kennedy, Bush caused 911, there are aliens at area 51...the list goes on and on.

The unfortunate thing is that these people are oft times rather intelligent and have no problem convincing simple minded people that there is some kind of credence to their irrational theories. I mean look at some of the crazy questions on this site alone! It's simply amazing!

The only valid theory that has some documented proof is that the past three presidents didn't do enough to prevent the terrorists from entering the country and didn't pull the trigger on other "preliminary strikes."

During Clinton's admin. we had a few chances to kill Bin Laden, during Bush's we missed a few opportunities to arrest some of the terrorists, and the CIA & FBI didn't communicate effectively. Nothing malicious, just a combinations of missteps by our government (and let's not leave out the governments of Canada, GB, France, Italy, Saudi Arabia and anyone else that could have had better intelligence) and bad intentions by the terrorists led to the attacks.

But, don't tell that to the conspiracy theorists...according to them, every phone is bugged, the government is evil, and the person they call an idiot (Bush) pulled off the biggest attack on U.S. soil in the history of the world and no one knows about it except for them...give me a break.

2007-01-12 11:53:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Osama bin weighted down and Al Quaeda planned and finished 911. Bush had warnings and left out them. He replaced into on vacation. After failing to catch binLaden, Bush were given inquisitive some conflict that replaced into completely unrelated. The Bush administration is now retaining thousands of prisoners who have not been tried. on the different hand, at the same time as the first commerce center bombing got here about, the Clinton administration arrested, tried, and jailed the perpetrators.

2016-11-23 14:57:46 · answer #5 · answered by schifano 4 · 0 0

rchlbsxy2,
GW Bush was not President when the US Embassies in Africa were bombed. Nor was he President when our soldiers in Somalia were ambushed. He was also not the President when the World Trade Center was attacked the first time. Was it Clinton's foreign policy that caused these attacks. What about the genicide in Darfur or the overthrow of an elected government in Somalia? Maybe, just maybe Muslim extremists are too blame. Something to consider.

2007-01-12 12:53:45 · answer #6 · answered by mferunden 2 · 1 0

no, I don't think Bush "caused" 9-11. He hasn't the brains to pull off such a caper. However, I do believe 9-11 was an inside job, for too many reasons to list here.

All that being said, Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11. Saddam had no ties with al qaeda. No WMDs were found in Iraq. The US is spending $2 Billion per week in Iraq... for what?

Whether there is or isn't another terrorist attack on US soil will not be determined by US military forces in Iraq.

2007-01-12 11:47:48 · answer #7 · answered by Jack C 5 · 2 3

Bush might not have caused it, but he certainly didn't prevent it. The man is a half wit redneck with Ivy League trappings, a pawn in a game he doesn't understand. The so-called war on terror is ascertaining we will have future attacks, not preventing them. Terror is on the rise, not in decline. This war is making the world a more chaotic place. Before Iraq, the terrorists had claimed 3,000 American lives with 911. Thanks to W, that number has doubled. I'm not stupid, buddy, at least I can do the math.

2007-01-12 11:57:25 · answer #8 · answered by celebduath 4 · 1 2

The people to blame are terrorist. I see the finger pointing all of the time but the fact is no one made the terrorist do what they did it was their choice. There are groups who encouraged their actions and Bush is trying to root them out.

2007-01-12 11:42:11 · answer #9 · answered by joevette 6 · 3 1

your right it wasn,t bush it was the man who owned the twin towers, he let some a.s. hole in the building to set booms because the own wanted to get the insurance of the twin towers, but he couldn,t unless it got attacked by terrorist, so he talked to bush,s brother and it,s a cover up and no one it,s going to find out, every one found out may by on the xzone radio.show. some time last year also it because the movie called fahenheit 9/11 makes it look that way, it,s all a bout hollywood.

2007-01-12 11:53:53 · answer #10 · answered by i,m here if you need to talk. 6 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers