2007-01-12 08:13:39 · 17 answers · asked by Sifting 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
They didn't have cameras millions of years ago.
2007-01-12 08:17:44 · answer #1 · answered by ÜFÖ 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I haven't studied the subject enough to comment on human beginnings being a result of evolution only, but even theists admit to some-Adam & Eve were the only two but the human population has a vast variety of races?
Even if evolution is proven wrong beyond a doubt, a deity with conflicting traits and a book full of errors won't become sensible or real.
2007-01-12 16:23:17 · answer #2 · answered by strpenta 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section1.html
Lots of transitionals there.
You see, it is a trick question spoon fed to you by your masters.
In refusing to define what a missing link is, they can simply move the goalposts every time we kick one through the uprights, and claim a miss.
Show a tadpole, then a frog, and you will claim the frog did not come from a tadpole because we didn't show a tadpole with legs. We show that, you move again and claim we didn't show onw with legs and lungs. We show that, you claim... et cetera to infinity.
define what you will accept as a "missing link" and we will show you one. You can't win this battle, the evidence is stacked against you to a degree you can't even fathom.
"Pfft. Facts. facts are useless, they can be used to prove anything even remotely true." -Homer Simpson
2007-01-20 13:01:09 · answer #3 · answered by Jay 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please first provide some substancial evidence that evolution isnt true.
If you keep up with any breaking scientific news, you would know that we are discovering new species all of the time. It is only a matter of time before we find evidence of the missing link.
2007-01-19 22:51:54 · answer #4 · answered by jen 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why arent there pictures of God?
To believe in ONE or the OTHER is silly.
Evolution, to an extent, has been proven.
I believe God created early versions of humans (maybe even ape-like humans), decided he didn't really care for that, and tweaked it over the years.
Evolution has to be real, else we would still be in mud huts and caves.
On the other hand, you cannot get something (universe) from nothing (poof, we have creation). Some sort of SOMETHING must have set things into motion.
Maybe we're just one big science experiment for God, and he decided, "Hey, I kinda like them!"
2007-01-12 16:21:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
1. I don't think they had camera's a hundred thousand to a few million years ago.... If christianity is true, why are there no pictures of god or anything related. There is just one book.
2007-01-12 16:48:04 · answer #6 · answered by Chaotic Melody 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You know... no one in this world, other than a tiny minority of Christian fundamentalists, has any problem accepting the proven fact that evolution is true.
Even the pope accepts this.
I hope you understand that you make your religion look incredibly bassackwards when you ask questions like this.
2007-01-12 16:19:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like you've got a few links missing.
2007-01-12 16:17:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
look dude.........
let me tell you what i believe about evolution......
may be it help you..............
with no offense to evolutionist and creationist......
humans and other species are in fact evolved....not created by god.....evolved by process of evolution......like a sperm and egg make a zygote... and that zygote makes a full man one day.......and all this microscopic egg and sperm got all info about complete human being......likewise.....the life started evolving from a microscopic size...but it was a guided evolution...by god....not random evolution....and its genetic code was fixed by god...and then it evolved into humans and other animals.....
this is that theory which can satisfy all believers and all non-believers .....and it left with no flaw.....
if you look at creationist theory it is practially and logically incorrect ...and so the thory of blind evoltion is also logically incorrect..
2007-01-12 16:30:11 · answer #9 · answered by Shak 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fish with fingers:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/03/4/l_034_03.html
legged sea-cows
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section1.html#morphological_intermediates_ex5
2007-01-12 16:28:10 · answer #10 · answered by mullah robertson 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
here's a hint...THERE AREN'T ANY! it always amazes me how, if their theory be true, why no one can produce? Show some evidence people! Read up on the Cambrian period. Even from the Darwinian perspective....they have no explanation.
Edit: also, I love how the other side resorts to insults....just shows their ignorance
2007-01-12 16:27:31 · answer #11 · answered by 4 Shades of Blue 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋