English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-01-12 06:19:25 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health Diet & Fitness

16 answers

I agree it depends on your body frame, height and size.

Worrying about your jean size is irrelavent as along as you are in good health. A person wearing a 16 or 18 can look better than a woman wearing a 6 or 7 as long as the 16 or 18 are healthy and in good shape in accordance to thier height and frame.

2007-01-12 06:25:44 · answer #1 · answered by EFruler 2 · 5 0

For me that is a size 18-20+ or a 36-38.

I am used to being 13-15 or a 32-34.

I dont like to call others fat, but for myself personally 18-20 is fat.. its going to take me a while after this baby to get back :*(

2007-01-12 06:24:44 · answer #2 · answered by timberleigh 4 · 3 1

It relies upon! not each length 10 or 16 lady looks the same! at the same time as some anybody is clearly better, the scale suits them extra ideal while some those who're outfitted smaller yet have extreme fat, they offer the impact of being higher. i ought to assert something better than 16 should be seen on the tremendous length, yet again, not each lady donning a 16 is made equivalent!

2016-11-23 14:24:54 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Depends on height and frame.

I do find it interesting how most people answered this question in reference to womens sizes and not men. Yet you are a guy, so it is very possible you were asking the question in reference to yourself.

Just demonstartes America's obsession with womens weight and size in my opinon. Not that it is going to change anytime soon, but just an observation.

2007-01-12 06:41:04 · answer #4 · answered by spiritualjourneyseeker 5 · 1 0

well I shouldn't talk but there's really no "FAT" people, it doesnt matter what size you are, but if you are unhealthily (if thats a word) Obese, don't take care of yourself, are a slob, etc, than it could be any size. The perfect size for myself would be a 10, so i guess anything size 16 or above would be fat? i dont know! it's everyone's personal preferance!

2007-01-12 06:23:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

Man or woman? Woman, probably once you get around size 18. For men, a waist size over 40 I guess.

2007-01-12 06:22:51 · answer #6 · answered by Biskit 4 · 2 0

From a woman's point of view: It all depends on the person's height. For instance, I'm only 5'1"...so me being a size 10 is kind of overweight. When I was at my 'healthy weight' (so says my doctor) I was a size 7/8. Other friends of mine thought...are size 10's but they're 5'5" or taller...and they look perfect.

2007-01-12 06:26:21 · answer #7 · answered by Swaygirl27 4 · 5 1

Any size could be considered "fat". You could be healthy, but someone would still think you are fat.

Because people arn't built the same. People are really "big boned". My doctor told me so. He told me that I probably couldn't get any smaller than a 10-12, because the way my bone structure was.

2007-01-12 06:24:07 · answer #8 · answered by ♥Brown Eyed Girl ♥ 5 · 2 2

until you can not wear any Jeans for woman stretch size, you're fat.

2007-01-12 06:24:55 · answer #9 · answered by candle l 2 · 2 0

As long as you are weight/height proportionate, you're not fat. If you're 6'0, you'll have a bigger waist than someone who's 5'0 (in theory anyway). You know if you're fat or not...you don't need your pants size to tell you that.

2007-01-12 06:23:24 · answer #10 · answered by Am I. Incognito 3 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers