how exactly was Iraq threatening our freedom in the first place?
2007-01-12 05:39:59 · 21 answers · asked by thelightedtorch 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
How can you say Saudi Arabia attacked the US, thats a bunch of crap. Bin Laden is kicked out of Saudi, and the Saudi's that commited that were part of 9/11 attack got there training from Osamah in Afganistan not Saudi. They represnt Bin Laden who is kicked out of Saudi. Saudi did not attack the US, Bin Laden did, and he is a coward and hiding in the caves. He screwed everything up and gave arabs a bad name, and used Islam to justify his actions which all muslims are against him except the stupid ones who have hate in there heart. The war in Iraq has nothing to do with Freedom, this has been planned out before you were born, you think America wakes up one morning and says were going to War, nah buddy, every thing is planned out for decades. The question is what does America want from the middle east and what are they trying to provoke to happen in the up coming years. It seemed there plan back fired or didn't it. Time will tell but please dont use the media to make your judgment, use history. The Middle east is always in war, why? Why is there a war every day? Killing innocent people is never justified no matter what you say. Who will protect the world from the US and its nuclear bombs huh? Lets be realistic the reason why the US is in Iraq today is for reasons which you will never think of because you can't think outside the box. You let the media do all the thinking for you and influence your emotions. After the US is done fighting the War in Iraq where are they going next? I would like to know that answer, which country are they going to start killing innocent people in the name of freedom. I love the US and I love human kind, I hate the fact we kill each other, is it really worth it to die , i wish we humans never killed each other, ohh well life goes on untill a nuclear bomb
2007-01-12 06:02:12 · answer #1 · answered by fox 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
We needed a foothold in the Middle East and Iraq is the perfect place. There was already terrorist activity going on there that needed to be dealt with. Maybe we should have dealt with terrorism and militant Islam with sanctions, peace treaties, and the United Nations. That's been a huge disaster for the last 50 years. The only thing the militants know is war and if you think that Iraq is only about freeing Iraq, you're wrong. There is about to be an even bigger Middle East conflict brought on by Iran and the closer we are to Iran the easier it will be to stop them. These people don't just hate Bush and democracy, they hate you also. They don't know you, but they hate everything you are and everything you stand for. They would just as soon shoot you where you stand than watch you not worship Allah.
2007-01-12 05:55:41 · answer #2 · answered by Johnny Z 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm not sure our freedom was at risk by Saddam, but our security sure has h-- was. If you don't believe he was supporting terrorists, you need to do a little more home work. I wonder what was in all the trucks that went from Iraq to Syria just before the war?
2007-01-12 05:48:19 · answer #3 · answered by Bob A 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The people who answered oil crack me up. Things sure would be different in the world if we had responded after the first WTC bombing or the Cole or the embassies in Africa. A Gallon of gas is still cheaper than a gallon of milk. No none is raising hell with the farmers for gauging the public.
2007-01-13 14:49:03 · answer #4 · answered by mferunden 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
^
9/11 has nothing to do with Iraq...
Anyway...
Iraq was never threatening our security to begin with.
But Iraq will now become a threat not only to itself, neighbors, the world, and the U.S. because of the number of extremist who spread their propaganda throughout the war-torn country. Like leeches these terrorist are using scare tactics to sway the minds of the innocent. And using deadly force, which usually kills innocent Iraqis, to demonstrate a political and religious point, that not everyone shares, or chooses to participate in.
The U.S. invasion of Iraq has created a breeding ground for Iranian terrorist and insurgency, and extremist in general. If America, Iraq and Coalition Forces to not gain control of Iraq. The extremist will. And the baddest, scariest, most hate-minded religious leader will step into office. Which will result in civil war, and pandemonium in the region.
2007-01-12 05:49:29 · answer #5 · answered by Clark W Griswold 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i'm particular that Senator Obama helps the adult males and females in uniform. No flesh presser must be certain damage come to the U. S. militia. What might want to you've him do to educate his help? carry a huge "I help the troops!" rally? I imagine even if he did that it would not replace your standpoint of him. So the sparkling mission right it truly is even if Obama stocks YOUR standpoint on the bigger topics of nationwide protection. i might want to guess that he does not. at the same time as it contains how us of a addresses different countries that threaten it is pastimes i imagine it would want to be solid for us to recollect that the globalization of our economic equipment, the technologies and understand- how that's actively traded between the international's countries places this u . s . a . at a downside at the same time as that's attempting to get what it needs. for this reason for the international to paintings some compromises must be made. To call for that a president push to get his way and threaten different countries in an attempt to rigidity them to save on such as his lead is stupid and short - sighted. the days of american dominance are quickly to end and the politicians of the destiny would ought to uncomplicated techniques to paintings in a better equivalent international.
2016-12-02 04:18:00 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They weren't.
As for 9/11 its been proven and said many times over Iraq had no ties to the terrorist that plotted and committed that atrocity.
2007-01-12 05:45:59 · answer #7 · answered by striderknight2000 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Sept.11!!!
Saddam a dictator. Dictators are like acne if you don't deal with the problem you are later going to have lots of problems. He will spread his kingdom farther by force. He would soon be a global threat and try to comsume it.
Now to those who know who really did the Sept.11 It was not Saddam it was al-Qaeda but they are all Islam that have one goal to win there "holy war"
2007-01-12 06:07:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
At first, they were believed to have weapons of mass destruction, which would threaten any country. At some point Saddam Hussein and his dictatorial regime were somehow linked with terrorism, which was why the was in Afghanistan came to place, it escalated to Irak. The presence of the US in Irak has unbalanced the shiite-sunny power struggle in the regio (Iran-Irak) as they were opposite and equal forces. Leaving right now would pose a threat as Iran would be unrivaled in the area, as they are powerful, the US army is trying to keep the balance in order to protect our freedom.
2007-01-12 05:52:43 · answer #9 · answered by Frank the tank 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
To those yelling 9/11? You mean that day that Saudi Arabia attacked America?
2007-01-12 05:46:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋