Evangelicals want to limit adoption to the "one man, one woman" ideal, and prevent gays and lesbians from even acting as foster parents. Where it's still legal, they throw up roadblocks to discourage it, like stopping second-parent adoption and opposing domestic partner benefits. But what about the thousands of kids currently being raised in group homes and for-profit foster homes, many of them minorities, older or problem kids, terminally ill, or seriously disabled with little or no hope of ever being adopted by an "ideal family"? And, this is just in the U.S.; millions more in Africa and elsewhere have been orphaned by the AIDS epidemic or abandoned by their birth parents as an alternative to starvation.
I'd like to hear some real alternatives to this problem from those that have knowingly and deliberately sacrificed these children's lives for the sake of "sending the right message".
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070112/people_nm/madonna_d
2007-01-12
05:35:27
·
3 answers
·
asked by
kena2mi
4
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
A couple follow-up comments-
- In Florida you cannot even act as a foster parent, let alone adopt. Focus on the Family, the Catholic Church, and others are spending millions pushing similar laws elsewhere
- Yes, clean white babies are a hot commodity, but many black, hispanic and AIDS babies are not
- The Catholic "charities" the one person is referring to are heavily subsidized directly by the government to provide these services. The Catholic Church, like the Boy Scouts, has every right to do as they please provided they stop taking taxpayer money
- The "just go to another state" response is hardly irrelevant to those that are not independently wealthy, and can't afford to take out a second mortgage to cover travel eexpenses
- In Michigan, I can adopt as an individual, but thanks to the state voters "defending" marriage, my partner could not adopt the child and my will granting custody to my partner could be contested by the state or a relative
2007-01-12
06:18:20 ·
update #1