Neither. God made me what i am. I am proud.
2007-01-12 04:12:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by godsapostolic 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've always found the rib to be the most insulting. Saying 'man came from dirt' doesn't sound great either. I think 'man came from the earth' sounds better and almost makes it sound a little like evolution, in a way. I'm not bothered by primates.
2007-01-12 04:27:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Pico 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolving from a common primate ancestor doesn't bother me in the slightest. I'm just glad that I'm not a squid, or something.
The other theories are just ridiculous, but the Eve being created from Adam's rib is the worst, IMO. It devalues women right from the start.
2007-01-12 04:11:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
DAY AGE FIVE IN CREATION
Animals and fowl in day age five were created from water, if any thing was programed to develope from them rather than be directly created [ call it evolve or what ever ]; No one saw it, but might see the remaining evidence.
DAY AGE SIX CREATION
Animals created from dust [ minerals and vitamins ], same as day six, except domestic and last was Adam and Eve.
I am not insulted to be made of and to need mimerals and vitamins, it is proof of where I came from. I am not ashamed that the food I eat does grow out of the dirt, dust and ground.
Eph.2:7; 3:31; The world with Jesus is without end, or the day ages, John 3:16;
2007-01-12 04:53:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by jeni 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't find any insulting. For one thing, I know that I did not come from a monkey, the first man in the entire world came from dust(from dust you came, to dust you shall return) and his wife, was formed from his rib. Why should I find that insulting? It says in the bible husband and wife become one. It also says in the bible directed towards women: The first woman came from man, but every man since that time has been born from a woman. (don't remember the exact verse) Anyway, I still don't see why I should be insulted. God is Great!!!!! Praise Jesus!
2007-01-12 04:33:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kat 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
the idea of theological evolution signifies that God created human beings at the same time as he infused an intellective soul right into a primate that changed into earlier an animal. for this reason the "clump of airborne dirt and mud" really refers back to the count number number of the international in an animal kind. that's accessible to settle for both evolution and creation, that's tremendous at the same time as one realizes that (a) we are positively appropriate to animals not straight away and (b) the universe and existence of their unique kinds might want to not have spontaneously come into existance and for this reason ought to were created
2016-12-02 04:13:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Man just can't take it that they were made from dirt, while the woman was made from living flesh eh? When the Lord returns, who is more likely to bend the knee, man or woman? Woman have been pretty well trained to stoop and bow, so you could tell what the answer will be.
2007-01-12 04:22:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The man's rib is most insulting. Funny tho.
2007-01-12 04:13:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Amber G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Being created from dirt! I would much rather have naturally evolved from organic life.
2007-01-12 04:14:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Being the result of random mutations is far more insulting than being descended from a special creation of God.
2007-01-12 04:17:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by mzJakes 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Christian: Evolution is baloney, to think that we all came from apes is ridiculous!
Atheist: well wheredo you think we came from then?
Christian: Why, Dust and Magic of course!
Enough said I think...
2007-01-12 04:17:10
·
answer #11
·
answered by whitewizard1988 2
·
1⤊
0⤋