I feel he killed her... I feel it in my soul....
2007-01-12 03:45:04 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
lol thats so funny!
2007-01-12 03:49:01 · answer #1 · answered by ÜFÖ 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
What you can not understand is that many of us have real proof, but that moment was just for us. The foundation of the scientific method is that the experiment in question must be able to be repeatedly confirmed, but how can this be when a relationship with the most high is of a personal nature. I could careless whether you beleive or not, I'm not the type to try to convince you, you should just keep your mind open, you might be surprised.
2007-01-12 04:02:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The fallacy of this comparison is beyond that of comparing apples and oranges.
How many times do we theists have to tell you atheists that proof of the existence of God does not have to physical in nature, because God is not by nature a physical Being?
2007-01-13 08:22:16 · answer #3 · answered by STILL standing 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm... You began off this question completely on the final suited music. it relatively is to assert, it is impossible to coach or disprove the existence of God, or Saddam Hussein, or the Flying Spaghetti Monster, because of the fact to assert that anybody of them exists is an unconditional fact and info purely applies to conditional statements (statements that have axioms to artwork with). notwithstanding, you have additionally made various blunders. First, as an atheist myself, i do no longer call for info of God's existence (for the above reasons) so as to have faith in him. notwithstanding, I DO call for sufficient info to enhance the possibility of his existence previous 50%. so a approaches no convincing info has been provided, so I evaluate that I nonetheless have a superbly functional foundation for rejecting God's existence in the mean time. 2d, purely as you could no longer teach the existence of Saddam Hussein or Hitler or Stalin, likewise you could no longer teach the existence of Jesus. there's no longer something that makes archives claiming the existence of Jesus basically greater credible than archives claiming the existence of Hitler or Stalin or the different historic determine. in addition to, in spite of the undeniable fact that there is a few historic info that the biblical determine of Jesus is in accordance with a real individual or team of folk, it relatively is a a approaches cry from having known that he replaced into in actuality the divine son of God, interior a similar sense that demonstrating the existence of Grigori Rasputin isn't comparable to demonstrating that he had psionic powers.
2016-10-07 01:28:07 · answer #4 · answered by esannason 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where/whom does the law that you're using to try that criminal come from? In other words, where does the moral law come from? Is not our justice system an outgrowth of the Mosaic law?
2007-01-12 03:50:28 · answer #5 · answered by God Still Speaks Through His Word! 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
"I know he killed her. It is written in this book."
"Everyone knows he killed her. It is common knowledge"
"He killed her because nobody can prove that he didn't"
Logical fallacies abound here in Yahoo R & S ;-)
2007-01-12 03:58:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
That's why OJ is still walking around.
2007-01-12 03:48:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
:) Dang it. I'm starting to like you. Stop it, will ya?
Jesus Saves!
2007-01-12 03:49:07 · answer #8 · answered by Sheryl 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We already do to a large degree .....sadly
2007-01-12 03:48:10 · answer #9 · answered by Uncle Thesis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no different situation and if you change your attitude then you might have a freakin chance...until then you wont
2007-01-12 03:48:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋