You are free to believe (or not) anything you wish. But your freedom stops at the skin of every other person. You may not act on your beliefs when they cause harm to another, or violate laws of your country, state, province, or whatever,
2007-01-12 03:40:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. Freedom of religion means just that. A person, or group of person should be free to behave in a manner consistant with their understanding of thier religious teaching WITHOUT interferance from anyone that is NOT part of that religion. That is the ONLY way that ALL religions can have true freedom is to have TRUE freedom for ALL religions,even those that we may not agree with.
2007-01-12 03:34:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by kveldulf_gondlir 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hate it more than most. But. In that evil religion are beautiful people. They are mind controlled just like anyone that follows a religion but they are good people. Would it not be better to reach out to them and prove they follow evil and help them walk away from it so they might be saved? I don't mean saved by another evil religion. I mean turn them around before they self destruct?
2007-01-12 03:39:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can think of three or four major religions that are tolerated in spite of the fact that they subtly promote violence in the name of their gods. So, yes, it should. Religions should be tolerated; the actions of the practitioners, however, should not be, especially when it involves creating more pain and suffering in the world.
2007-01-12 03:35:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by That Guy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Freedom of religion could advance in trouble-free words to your self, your relatives (till they improve up and make their own decision) and your church. Freedom of religion could also enable for asking others to hitch, yet when someone says no, then no skill no. even with the actual incontrovertible truth that some religious beliefs irk me and that i'd under no circumstances take section, i'd enable the right of others to finish that. I do trust that express guidelines could always be upheld hostile to the rights of a church (like baby molestation or abuse and homicide). The nonprofit guidelines utilized by using church homes could comprise audits.
2016-10-30 22:12:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's why it's called "Freedom" in the first place.
What is junk to one person may be valuable to another.
We are all different.
To insist that we all be the same is a form of enslavement.
No matter how different we may be. we are all ONE.
The way dark and light are not the same and yet come from the same source and cannot exist without the other.
Would you deny your brother because he looks and acts different from you?
2007-01-12 03:56:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Dawn Breaker 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
We don't. The Federal authorites have a long history of going after KKK members (they claim to be a Christian organization), the Branch Dividian Church, Jamestown and they raided a Mosque and arrested several men for preaching terrorism and being affilated with terrorists. The also have arrested Mormons who practise polygamy.
2007-01-12 03:36:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No violence and murder should not be tolerated against any religeon by any other religeon in this present age. God in this church age is not in the business of fire and brimstone and killing any group off, but in grace and mercy. No murders or violence should be tolerated against anyone else OR against me or my country.
2007-01-12 03:35:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by sheepinarowboat 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If your religion advocates killing off others, then your religion can not be acted upon by you. Our laws allow you to believe you should kill us. But the same laws do not allow you to do so in actuality.
2007-01-12 04:12:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by swamp elf 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
We should never tolerate violence by any group of people. Especially those that do violence in the name of God.
2007-01-12 03:37:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ray W 6
·
1⤊
0⤋