English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We have enough ice now in our refs ...
We need plant trees in the deserts and irrigat them to catch CO2 , to make O2 and fruits to eat.
Just we need share the excesses of water

2007-01-12 01:34:01 · 5 answers · asked by pingouin 3 in Environment

more details there
http://www.dailymotion.com/jeandb/video/xxwq7_le-bief-du-saut-du-gier7janvier2007

2007-01-12 02:49:55 · update #1

5 answers

...Interesting way to turn out the problem; however, think about the food supply. The genetic codes of all the grains and veggies we use for our consumption and for feeding the animals we eat are not going to change as fast as climate warming progresses; it won't be able to adjust to " the new seasons" the Mother Nature is trying to spell on us. As a result, we may not have as much harvest as we used to get. So, how we going to feed multiplying population? In addition, the global warming is accountable for increasing the level of see, but this is the SALT water. Desalinization is very energy-consuming and expensive process so far...

2007-01-12 03:54:13 · answer #1 · answered by fadevka 1 · 0 0

Climates change over time, global warming ? I hate cold weather anyway. Government is just trying to restrict us more. Pay more for vehicles, gas, more fees everywhere. Yet, wasnt there a man who invented using plain old water to run a motor and the oil companies bought the rights to his invention, and hid it away ? The gov needs to exercise emminent domain and take the patent.

Also, cant we use corn for fuel ? But hey, that would get us away from our dependence on foreign oil, keep us from fighting for oil, and (gasp) put American farmers back where they need to be, at the top of the food chain. Then , we'd have no use for all those laws, including emissions tests, and where would Americans be ? We might have a little too much money in our pockets.

2007-01-12 09:49:21 · answer #2 · answered by QueenA 3 · 0 0

I think it's part of the earth's self-healing capabilities. Warmer temperatures mean more vegetation in areas where there is now little or none (alarmists will talk about deserts but most deserts are the result of poor land management), more vegetation means more oxygen and less CO2, more vegetation means more water being taken up from the ground, cleaned, and transpired back into the atmosphere; and on and on... I say, bring it on!!

2007-01-12 09:53:01 · answer #3 · answered by Spud55 5 · 0 0

Global warming is very real. It is a natural thing but humans are speeding it way up. Naturally it is a good thing for our climate but we are speeding it up way too much.

2007-01-12 09:44:27 · answer #4 · answered by jessecalydie 2 · 0 0

Global warming is pure horsehillary, made up by the greenie-weenie, pinko, wacko environmentalists who want to take the US back to its economy of 1830. Forget it-- it's pure bullclintoon. Don't be part of the stupid set...

2007-01-12 09:37:36 · answer #5 · answered by christopher s 5 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers