What do you think of Bush's new idea, of sending MORE troops to Iraq? More of the same stupidity??? yes or no

Answer 1

The entire Iraq war has been a conflict fabricated by Puppet Master Cheney and Puppet Dubyah. There was no intent of ever winning this war. There is no intent in winning this war. There will be no intent on winning this war. A change of administration may end it.

The Iraq`war will only end when the Iraqi's themselves decide that they have had enough death and destruction, and they have a collective will to change the status quo. Continued American and Allied presence only serves to foment the situation further and provide targets for Iraq violence and vengence.

Increasing the number of troops in Iraq, if even for a short "surge" will only add to the deterioration of a bad situation. This move plays directly into the hands of the enemy. This is what they want: increased body counts.

It's time to look at this by stepping back and examining all the options. For example, no consideration was given to an immediate withdrawal of all troops. Why not? The Puppet Master and the Puppet have too much to lose. However, this tactic would catch the enemy off guard. Also the enemy would get so caught up in the turmoil after a withdrawal, that all the efforts of all the various terrorist groups would be focused on trying to take control of Iraq. This would be a futile effort and the fighting would continue, as it does inside Palestinian territory.

Let's leave them to their own devices. They'll be so consumed with fighting among themselves, they won't have the time or resources to do anything else. Let them serve as their own distraction.

And the rest of us can get on with living our lives in the solitude and peace of the western world.

Answer 2

I can understand your questions because you have so little information to rely on if you do not read a great deal of news from sources other than sound bytes on TV. The troop surge is to do a final clean up to turn over Iraq to local forces and to get almost everyone else out. The generals on the ground ask for more troops, and fresh troops at that, to do this mission. The NG unit my brother is in was told this and trained for a month on that mission. You are mouthing the sound byte of new Dems who got some power back by making people believe that they were somehow different than the Repubs and they had nothing to do with the war effort. That of course is all stupid if you are looking for stupid, as this country went to war when the Dems held control of congress, just like now. They will make a lot of noise to fool folks like you into thinking that they are doing a lot to stop all of this but they are not. Dems are not much different than Repubs but they have a lot more people that they have to appease and convince that they are doing things and that is the trap of trying to be everything to all people and you end up being nothing to anyone. The Dems are not going to vote against anything of the sort but they might try to make you believe that they are. So far all Pelosi has really said is that she is a grand mother and literally nothing of substance beyond that. The troops push is the exit and since the Dems would rather not see the troops come home they need to make a lot of noise right now.

Answer 3

No actually it is something that the boots on the ground asked for from the very beginning but Bush and Rummy said no. The extra troops are needed if they want to hold on to areas that they clear of terrorist. Currently they clear an area and don't have the man power to protect it afterwords so the terrorist return.
I would like to see the troops backed out for a little while just to see if the violence would slow down as many believe,

Answer 4

I think that invading Iraq in the first place was unnecessary, I don't believe they posed a credible threat to the United States. However since we did go in and perform a regime change are we not responsible to see this through? If we pull our soldiers out now the scale of the blood bath to follow will be incredible, think Rwanda all over again. We have a responsibility to see this through NO MATTER WHAT THE COST. A responsibility to the Iraqi people to stabilize the country and help them get strong enough so they can stand on their own. Anything less would be criminally negligent.

I am a US Army veteran, I would gladly serve again if I could.

Answer 5

a lifeless ringer for he fired Richard A. Clark, Bush's senior counter-terrorism adviser, at the same time as Clark warned of an attack like the only which surpassed off on 9/11. It wasn't what Bush had to hearken to. Colin Powell did not get fired, although. He finally resigned because he might want to not lie for Bush like he changed into ordered to do on the United countries. Condi has no such problem with integrity at the same time as it contains pushing Bush's agenda. the purely Bush survivors are those who agree such as his standpoint, the perenial "definite-adult males" (and females).

Answer 6

Its really stupid… cuz like really what happened to the troops that went there last time???? Did they die did they just give up??? I don’t get him… he should like work on some world peace issues and stuff like that like more troops??? What is wrong with him. One day all of america might be in Iraq if he keep s this up…

Answer 7

It's obviously absurd and detrimental. I'd like to know from my fellow country men and women who still support him.....Why don't you go on over to Iraq and finish off this war....it would do everyone good if you all spend a little less time accusing people who stand up for this nation as being anti American Liberals....and spend more time shutting your mouths and doing a little more action. It was the 53 idiot million Americans that have not only caused the deaths of innocent lives in Iraq...but have also definitely caused the 3,000 deaths of our brothers and sisters fighting this senseless war in Iraq.

Answer 8

I'd rather see a surge of B-52s over Baghdad as soon as we can get our own troops clear of the area.

Answer 9

Most Americans disagree with it but... what if it actually works? I wonder why Bush is ignoring his advisors, but he must have a reason. He doesn't have to worry about getting re-elected, so maybe he doesn't care about public opinion and is simply doing what he believes has a chance to work. Hopefully it will work, but the only way to tell is to wait and see if it does.

Answer 10

Maybe now the soldiers can go after these militias that are causing the problems, at the same time kill some Iranians. Untying the hands of the soldiers is long overdo.