Put Bush and Blair on trial for mass murder and crimes against humanity?

Question

How many women and children have been targeted by occupation forces since they went into Iraq? Since the invasion there has been countless accusations of war crimes including rape torture and the mass-murder of unarmed civilians (hospital and school bombings).

What is happening in Iraq at the moment is nothing short of what the Black and Tans done in Ireland at the start of this centuary. Saddam was tried quiet rightfully for his crimes, and debatably hanged. Should the US and British leaderships now be tried for their respective crimes? They are after all an invasion force that attacked a country without provocation without UN backing, no different to Iraqs invasion of Kuwait.
The excuse for the US's invasion was to rid the world of "Weapons of Mass Destruction". So far no weapons of mass destruction have been found. In fact the US holds the largest stockpile of nuclear warheads, is the only country to have used such weapons (Hiroshima and Nagasaki) and most likely to do so again.

Answer 1

Check these out...
http://www.strayreality.com/Lanis_Strayreality/iraq.htm
http://www.rense.com/general58/suspre.htm
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/list_of_satanist.htm

Answer 2

How many innocent men women and children have been killed under saddam and other forms of terrorists?May i add that some cases of accussastions have been proven in a court martial to be false and that they were doing if for the money ??? You seem to be of the opion that the forces are the bad guys well if it was not for them how many more kurds would be dead .. it is not easy bringing a country ruled by dictaorship into a normalised world .No they should not be tried as they did what they believed was required to protect their countries they did not make the decision themselves

Answer 3

I suppose that the best answer to this inane rambling you post as a question is to respond that if that were to actually happen (It won't because your rant is based on the groundless mutterings of left wing lunatics) then we would have to try and convict all of the Congressional leadership, including the Democratic leaders who went ON RECORD and VOTED to invade. If you are ready to include that bunch of hypocrites then I guess go ahead. The roar we all heard when we did not achieve immediate victory (even though W was dumb enough to declare an end to "major combat op's" ) was not from bombs but from the Democratic leadership scurrying from their support of the war like roaches from the light.

WMDs. Dumb move to justify a war on that. But face it, you guys have ridden that poor old horse completely to death. Move on already. We are there. We can't leave until there is some sort of stability, or we will REALLY have created a situation that is worse than when we arrived.

My son is a Marine who served in Iraq from the opening day of the war until he was wounded for the second time earlier this year. Either you don't have the slightest clue as to who and what the Black and Tans did in Ireland, or you have no clue as to what the US forces are doing in Iraq. Either way, you have put your ignorance on display for everyone to see, and there are plenty of fools who agree with you, as is in evidence from above. My only slim hope is that this is just frustration with a war that is harder than we ever thought, with comments born out of ignorance, and not that there are really people who actually believe the line of crap you just laid out. It's a slim hope.

OH yeah. We've had nuclear weapons for over 60 years now, and only used them twice within the 1st 6 months of that period. How in the world could you ever make the leap to us being "most likely to do so again"? Seems to me we have used extraordinary restraint over the DECADES ! Geez...

Answer 4

Sure, the fact that Bush has kept the islamofascists from attacks on US soil since 9/11 is constantly overlooked. Perhaps you should ask the family members of the thousands of Kurds who were killed by hussein's "non-existent" chemical weapons. Anyone with a brain knows they were shipped off to syria, but then again you are obviously a liberal leftist extremist. You are the enemy within.

Answer 5

Bush and Blair are the leaders after Saddam who need to be tried and sent to the gallows.They are known dictators of the current world,worser than Banito Mussolinni and fugitive Adolf Hitler.They deserve execution by their heads chopped off.The UN and the international community must fully and urgently react to rid the now more peaceful world before those wolves.I do support the idea of this two gangsters be tried under the international criminal law and charged with crime against the global citizens

Answer 6

As one who is anti Bush and anti war,,I will have to disagree with you for the simple reason, that I am sure schools and hospitals have been targeted but I am in doubt they were deliberate, meaning its a fact that Iraqi insurgents and foreign terrorist have used both,not to mention Mosque,to launch attacks for propaganda purposes...under rules of engagement in war. they have a right to fire back !I
As far as rape and torture..American soldiers have been on trial and trials continue for this..and hard sentences have been handed down recently.so in the very least. there is an acknowledgment that this is unacceptable !

Answer 7

If you don't see what is going in Iraq, literally. I suggest you shut your mouth. Innocent women and children are dying here because of insurgents. How do you know who is an insurgent? Can't. They could be anybody walking down the middle of the street.So you have "anybody" walking down and just shooting women and children.If the U.S. withdraws,you'll have another KILLING FIELDS in Iraq.Just like when the U.S. withdrew from Southeast asia. Your that kind of person that doesn't know but want to open your mouth.The U.S. doesn't want to be in Iraq but want to stabilize the country and get the hell out.Go to Iraq and find out for yourself before you open your mouth.

Answer 8

Hey Scorpion wut up here i edited it to fit some of your Q?s from the Other Forum

heres my thoughts
alot of people would say Clinton is Better but this state is not neccerarely True when Clinton was in Office he approved and ordered a Strike on Iraq from December 16 1998 to December
19 1998 October 31, 1998 president Clinton signed into law H.R. 4655, the "Iraq Liberation Act." The new Act appropriated funds to Iraqi opposition groups in the hope of removing Saddam Hussein from power by force if neccicary and replacing his regime with a democracy. So the Point is If Clinton did not get kicked out of Office we would have been in the same war maybe even earlyier. and i agree wit Bush troop surge is good becuz ither we are there For a long time or we Outnimber and win if we bring the Troops home that will just show the rest of the world that we ARE bullies and destroyers thus more Terrosist groups will attack us...there are around 1000 iraqi Military forces now!

-65% of the militia that are attacking us are from other Islamic goverments that are perticipating in a Global Jihad

-We use to get 24% of our oil from Iraq befor 1990 when we invaded we now get only 16% of our oil from them that is why gas is so much.

-WMD's include Chemical Warfare and Biological Warfare, in 1988 Saddam unleashed SARIN and VX Gas on the Village of Halabja killing 5000 Civillian woman and children and Disabiling 10,000 more so aparently he had WMD's

-My 2 Cusins are over in Iraq, Army and Marines Striker Bregade,Fort Lewis, Washington and they see stuff that we would never see like schools being built and equal rights for woman and they are proud to be there.

-Clinton Luanched many Tomohawk Cruise Missiles at Iraq in 1998 so who started the event leading up to this war, if we leave iraq many more will suffer while more power hungry Islamic leaders tear appart iraq then Terrosists come in!


-TO answer Scorpions stupid Q? yes President Bush did get Impeached, And heres all the Suppliers of Chemical Warfare to Iraq in the late 1980's it goes by how many Ton from Greatest to the Least---West Germany (Germany),UK,France,China,Netherlands,USA,Egypt,India,UAE (United Arab Emrites)
-----AND yes there are schools being Rebuilt buddy i interview 8 soilders from The Striker Brigade from Fort Lewis Washington that have been over there,the media never focases on the Good thing cuz alot of people are not interested in that stuff so yea


Yea why did u ask if Clinton was out of Office? ima still confused abt that one and yea ima only 16, and yes we did give saddam some Chemical warfare but we gave him few of it and the U.S and Saddam agreed that Saddam would only use those Chemical Warfare devices on Irani Military Perosnel--idono where ur from but theres alot of Positive stuff goin on in Iraq my Dad has been there he is a Contractor for the U.S. military, half my Family is in the military i have been to 11 schools and moved 14 times lol so yea Peace

-Ryan C.
from SEATTLE

I AGREE WITH THE WAR

Answer 9

I agree! True the insurgents are killing more people than US soldiers. Why, because the of the US trying to conform everyone. (Everyone is not meant to be the same) Was the insurgents killing this much before the US invade Iraq...NO! In-fact Saddam was punished for crimes he committed in the 80's. We should punish Bush and all of our four fathers/leaders for allowing slavery / the massacre of the Indians / and the massive lynching that took place in our history. Bush's administration is definitely the pot calling the kettle black!

Answer 10

Blair couldn't not back bush too much was at stake for him not to join america in the War against TERROR,

Answer 11

Absolutely! Bush has committed treason, which is punishable by death in the U.S. Bush and Blair don't speak for the people - they don't even know what it's like to be one of "the people". They live in their luxurious bubble and just watch the real world on T.V. And to all those people who believe anything that criminal posing as President of the U.S. says, WAKE UP! I was one of you just a few years ago, and I'm telling you - you are being fooled!