English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I checked the Boeing Sikorsky website but I wasn't able to find much information, maybe I didn't search hard enough. Did they cancell it because there was really no need for it? The Kamov choppers can out manouver it? Economical Costs or what? Both long and short answers are greatly appreciated.

2007-01-11 20:21:47 · 5 answers · asked by mjshrapnel 1 in Politics & Government Military

5 answers

"Cancellation

However, on February 23, 2004, the U.S. Army announced their decision to cancel the Comanche helicopter program in view of the need to provide funds to renovate the existing helicopter fleet of aging attack, utility, and reconnaissance aircraft. Also a factor was the growing popularity in the military of using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for reconnaissance purposes – in addition to tests, UAVs had proven their worth in Afghanistan and Iraq. About US$8 billion had already been invested in the Comanche program at the time of its termination and an additional US$450-680 million was required in contract termination fees to main program partners Sikorsky and Boeing Integrated Defense Systems.

Technology developed for the Comanche will be integrated into the Apache and other U.S. military helicopter developments. Some of its roles will be taken over by the ARH-70, an off-the shelf armed reconnaissance helicopter.

Currently both prototype airframes 95-0001 and 94-0327 are at the Army's Aviation Missile RDEC at Redstone Arsenal, AL. They now belong to the Engineering Support Division, though there are plans to return 95-0001 to the U.S. Army Aviation Museum at Fort Rucker, AL in 2007"

2007-01-11 20:31:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The main reason the RAH-66 was canceled was a lack of funds to complete everything we need in the US Army at the time.

The watchword of the day was "do more with less and save money". As with everything else, the Clinton Administration was not interested in anything but slashing the military.

What happened instead was to combine the technology if that helicopter with an upgrade to the AH-64. The new AH-64 "Longbow" also got an upgraded sensor package rendering the Kiowa observation helicopter less necessary.

2007-01-11 20:35:08 · answer #2 · answered by wolf560 5 · 0 1

February 23, 2004, the U.S. Army announced their decision to cancel the Comanche helicopter program in view of the need to provide funds to renovate the existing helicopter fleet of aging attack, utility, and reconnaissance aircraft. Also a factor was the growing popularity in the military of using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for reconnaissance purposes – in addition to tests, UAVs had proven their worth in Afghanistan and Iraq. About US$8 billion had already been invested in the Comanche program at the time of its termination and an additional US$450-680 million was required in contract termination fees to main program partners Sikorsky and Boeing Integrated Defense Systems.

Technology developed for the Comanche will be integrated into the Apache and other U.S. military helicopter developments. Some of its roles will be taken over by the ARH-70, an off-the shelf armed reconnaissance helicopter.

Currently both prototype airframes 95-0001 and 94-0327 are at the Army's Aviation Missile RDEC at Redstone Arsenal, AL. They now belong to the Engineering Support Division, though there are plans to return 95-0001 to the U.S. Army Aviation Museum at Fort Rucker, AL in 2007.

The Army currently has an armed scout helicopter in its fleet — the OH-58D Kiowa Warrior — but that aircraft is an upgraded version of a Vietnam-era observation helicopter. In contrast, the Comanche was specifically tailored to the role of armed scout. It is smaller and lighter than the Apache gunship — 43 feet (13.1 m) long and 7,700 pounds (3500 kg) vs. 58 ft (17.7 m) and 11,400 pounds (5200 kg) – and its composite material airframe incorporated stealth features to avoid detection, such as retractable weapon stations and main gun, faceting and RAM. It has the capability to remotely guide a missile launched by an assisting jet to its own target. The Comanche's noise signature is noticeably smaller than others in its class.

The Comanche's very sophisticated detection and navigation systems were intended to allow it to operate at night and in bad weather. Its airframe was designed to fit more easily than the Apache into transport aircraft or onto transport ships, enabling it to be deployed to hot spots quickly. If transport assets were not available, the Comanche's ferry range of 1,260 nautical miles (2330 km, 1553 Statuate Miles) would even allow it to fly to battlefields overseas on its own.

The Army planned to purchase almost 1,300 Comanches to fill the scout and light attack roles, with the first craft to be brought into the Army in 2004. The Army conducted flight qualification tests and evaluated the two DEM/VAL (Demonstration and Validation Phase) prototypes. The first of those prototypes was rolled out of the Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation's helicopter production facility in May 1995 and had its first flight in December 1995.

2007-01-11 22:10:30 · answer #3 · answered by rgrahamh2o 3 · 0 1

I don' t know. I just got out of the military last month. I like the Stallion helicopter. The one that was used in Rambo First Blood. That helicopter. That was a bad mother...

2007-01-11 20:26:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Because it was costing too much and was not doing what it was promised to do.

2007-01-11 20:25:23 · answer #5 · answered by Frank R 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers