Should US invade Iran If they attack Israel?

Answer 1

The question is "should we invade Iran...." and part of the problem is that we were one of the 5 countries that helped establish Israel. We, as the United States, HAVE to help out Israel because have treaties signed to that effect.

It is the same way with Tiawan. The only difference there is because China is one of the five nations that was invaded during WWII and is on favored nation status because of that. It makes things a bit more difficult.

Answer 2

If Iran attacks Isreal, Isreal will probably nuke them, we don't want to be anywhere in the neighborhood, in fact you may want to look up the reccomendations for sheltering from radiation the next week or so anywhere in the northern hemisphere,and have the food and water supply and fuel for at least a week on hand. because the radiation will go global within days and Clinton did away with the nuclear civil defense shelters. I don't expect us to "invade" Iran anyways, until we have a target of aquisition they can't simply knock out with airpower. Syria is more likely to make an offensive into Isreal with Iran threatening to attack from either east or west agianst American or Allied forces, don't be surprised if this is coordinated with some disturbance by North Korea or Venezeula to try and get us off balance, or a teror attack against the USA. there is no doubt Syria and Iran are behind the cause of problems in Iraq, and hopeful presidential candidates having tea and cookies with the Syrian dictator responsible for killing our troops in Iraq doesn't set well with me.PS North Korea has one of the largest stockpiles of Chemical and Bio weapons in the world, which is why we aren't taking action against them, because we could accidentally trigger the release of these or they might have a "deadstick" option. Again, there is nothing so brave as someone deep in a bunker letting his civilians and troops die for his glory.

Answer 3

No, Iran has no intention of attacking israel regardless of what the media tries to feed us about how dangerous and threatening Iran appears to be. It's actually the other way around. Israel is actually preparing right now to take military action against Iran, why do you think el presidente boosh is sending 20,000 more troops to the middle east. Once again the wool is being pulled over America's blind eyes.

Answer 4

No! I believe that Israel could defeat Iran single-handedly...yet Iran attacking Israel is the same as USA attacking France! It's a very weird issue!

Answer 5

At this moment I can't see how, with our troops scattered all over the world in all kind of conflicts. But, I definitely support them both duking it out...one on one.
Also, with Dems in power, they will say "no mas", and high tail it out of there.
We all know that Bush if he saw this question, would fall deeply in love with its idea, I guarantee it.
If we are lucky, it might happen before his term ends, and we as Americans can foresee what his intentions would be after 2 terms of office, and would be able to see all the fireworks in the skies..and to further my statement in saying, if US is involved with Iran, I hope the Dems will at least show a little backbone, instead for taking up all the TV/radio airtime to SAY nothing and DO nothing.
Everyone, would then be demanding for another President like Bush who has the balls to do the job.
1 or 2 minutes before an air-strike on Hezbollah following the attack of our Marines in Beirut, called off by Dems.
Our military ship attacked by suicidal terrorist, Dems a simple apology will do.
Come on lets get real and know who we are a SUPERPOWER, and make sure that no one ever forgets it. JUST LIKE JAPAN, they will always remember our military capabilities. As far as chemical weapons, how naive for anyone to believe that the US would not have any and use it, with the right person in place.

Answer 6

we are no longer going to invade Iran. you are able to examine regardless of indications you want. you are able to bypass see what the chicken's entrails say and we nevertheless gained't invade Iran. with out an excellent buildup of defense force capacity (on the floor), it isn't achieveable to drag off that form of element. including 20,000 troops to the single hundred thirty,000 in Iraq would not signify an excellent advance. Neither does a service conflict team in the gulf. certain, it may blow up a set of stuff, yet thats about it. Politically, the president wouldn't have the clout had to reserve such an attack. Congress would under no circumstances bypass alongside with out a boatload of evidence that Iran grow to be promptly in contact by some type of aggression hostile to the U. S.. Even then, that that they had likely argue about it for a year or more suitable. in case you imagine Bush can rigidity it with out congress, bypass evaluation the conflict Powers Act. He can respond to coming near threats with out consent of Congress, yet only for as a lot as ninety days. After that factor, Congress has to approve any continuation....and all of us recognize they gained't except a Dem president began it.

Answer 7

Git er dun! The US should level the place because of the ongoing insurgent support that impeads the Iraq mission. This would have been done already had it not been for Iran keeping the battle going here.

Answer 8

Are you kidding?

Have you not noticed how many billion dollars we have squandered on creating a civil war in Iraq? We have lost over 3,000 troops and had over 10,000 maimed. We have squandered billions of dollars and all we have to show for it is a massive debt, and a civil war we can't fix.

The government has just changed the law to allow our war weary 'all volunteer army' to be forced to serve even more combat time against their will.

We can keep invading country after country, trying to fix all the problems in the world. But all we will do is get our people killed, bankrupt our country, and lose everything we have worked so hard to achieve.

Thanks to George Bush we are becoming ever more isolated with fewer and fewer nations willing to pitch in and help us fight our wars.

The military should be for defense, and not used to invade countries like Iraq. If we had that philosophy we would not be in the mess we are in right now. Bush has spread our resources far too thin and squandered billions of dollars, and he has nothing to show for his efforts except blood on his hands.

If we had to invade another country right now, we'd probably need to start drafting civilians.

Answer 9

THere is no we should or we shouldn't. The US will strike Iran if Iran actually attack Israel. There's no ifs and buts about it.

Answer 10

Like hell. Let Israel fire off a few nukes in her own damn defense, they've already threatened to do so. Why should American troops die for Israel? They are to protect American lives and to defend the Constitution of the United States, they are not paid by the taxpayer to support Israel.