English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

would you rather be isolated in prison with no paroll. Food is deliverd to you while you are in the cell. toilet is in the cell. youre the only one with no one around you. YOu just sit in your cell for 100 straight years. Or take the death penalty and see what happens

2007-01-11 15:23:19 · 17 answers · asked by Sharoof 2 in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

17 answers

If I committed a crime that deserved one of those, I would deserve whichever punishment made me suffer the most.

Assuming I had the same feelings I have now, if I committed a crime worthy of one of those choices, I would feel so guilty that I would WANT to suffer as much as possible, and I would DESERVE to suffer as much as possible, as well.

I would choose life without parole for myself... but I would be ok with the death penalty, if the family I harmed felt they would have closure with my death. I would acknowledge the fact that if I ever took someone else's life, I would, by my actions, be surrendering my right to choose my own sentence... much less the rest of my life.

2007-01-11 15:37:37 · answer #1 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 0 0

"better efficient that ten in charge persons destroy out than that one danger free go by" The demise penalty is eternal. Irreversible. There are those who truly, truly deserve it and each and each and every and each and each and every of the guidelines, and the brutality of the crime propose so. the mission is the criminal gadget, criminal justice, is misguided. at the same time as DNA finding out matured it develop into were given right here throughout the time of that a contact spectacular kind of danger free human beings sat on demise row, or had already been carried out. undesirable adequate if you're were given right here throughout the time of danger free after a protracted sentence and freed. you're able to not free a ineffective guy. it truly is not any apology for the in charge both. This has to do with a basic concept in certain center values. No cruel and unusual punishment being in uncomplicated words one. If any state can teach to the customary public that each and each and every and each and each and every unmarried guy or lady ever carried out develop into in charge than that's one element. yet killing danger free human beings subsequently of fact the present technological suggestions develop into unavailable isn't a suitable excuse. this exhibits the state murdered some one. the get mutually you offered? life without parole. except he's proved danger free. Then let him flow. the photo? that's cruel or unusual. detect truly analysis that shows that has some needed result. some establishments have sufferer / inmate classes the position the sufferer has a range (or survivors) of somewhat attempting to get interior the inmate's head. there is likewise sufferer / survivor statements at sentencing. Restitution will be presented in certain circumstances, extraordinarily in Civil courtroom docket the position there's a shrink burden of information, The OJ Simpson case illustrates this somewhat precise. We as a society have desirous to punish the in charge in a prescribed way. Anger, outrage, and creativity do not play a function as our recommendations ought to like.

2016-12-02 03:52:08 · answer #2 · answered by duperne 4 · 0 0

Its technically the same thing now. The wait on death row is approximately 40 years. I would go to prison. Conditions there are much nicer than Death Row.

2007-01-11 15:33:02 · answer #3 · answered by TheDeagler 2 · 2 0

umm good question...

i'd would lean towards prison time cause then i could get right with God
before i die...and where there is life there is hope...

on the other hand if i had been framed or mistakenly convicted
i'd want the death penalty....i'd rather be with God...

2007-01-11 15:29:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If there is NO chance that you're attorney will eventually stave your life off long enough to get you out...death penalty. Seemingly fast and not too agonizingly painful after a few brief moments. (Fast is actually the best way to go...hehe)

2007-01-11 15:26:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Death, at least I won't suffer for years, death is a quicker end.

2007-01-11 15:26:28 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 3 0

I will actually take death. Besides, I would love to go into the glorious heaven afta.

(If talking about religion is an offense, im sorry)

2007-01-11 15:28:05 · answer #7 · answered by Christian 4 lyf 2 · 2 1

It really does not matter, becasue the way this crappy justice system is, you might die of old age while on death row. They take too damn long to execute someone.

2007-01-11 15:39:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Death penalty, you are the walking dead without freedom!

2007-01-11 15:27:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Death, no question about it.

2007-01-11 15:54:37 · answer #10 · answered by johN p. aka-Hey you. 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers