Should we be in Iraq?

Answer 1

Yes!

As Bush said, America is in Iraq to protect its interest....

Answer 2

Yes, of course. Saddam essentially "violated his U.N. parole" by acting as if he had weapons of mass destruction. If Bush hadn’t ordered the invasion of a country that repeatedly aid and comfort (and potentially weapons of mass destruction) to Al-Qaeda and other terrorists he would have had been in need of impeachment (not reelected as he was) for doing what needed to be done to prevent another 9/11.

Since Hussein kept kicking out the weapons inspectors the only way to prove if Iraq had U.N. banned WMDs or not was to invade and do a thorough check. Well, guess what? We found some! (Not much but a little.) But even if we had never found a shred of evidence we still had to invade to investigate.

Now that we're there we have to stay there till the job is done or Iran will proceed to mount a full-scale invasion and we will be responsible for opening the floodgates on a bloodbath that makes Darfur look like Disney.

IslamoFascists believe that America must die and the first step is driving the U.S. out of Iraq. They are nuts but you have to admit that they're probably right about Iraq.

Which you rather the 4,000 Al-Qaeda radicals killed so far in Iraq had been spending their time: A.) Setting up roadside bombs in Iraq to kill our friends and family serving in the military or B.) Setting up trash can explosives to detonate and kill you when you're at the shopping mall? Frankly I'd prefer to let the truly brave (no Bush bashers members of this elite club) risk death every day with a gun in their hand and a chance to shoot back rather than turning on the tube and see the charred remains of Americans being carried out of what used to be a Best Buy.

If we don't decide to quite whining about Iraq and fight to win the war the radical Muslims in Iran (who declared on America back in 1979 and have been fighting to kill us all ever since) are going to quickly move the front lines of this war back to our own side of the planet. This war is not about cheap prices at our gas pumps, It is about not having thousands of Americans die in a single day on our own soil again by brainwashed Jihadists like September 11, 2001... or have we already forgotten?

Answer 3

Let's see....Saddam did not have weapons of mass destruction, He did not try to pick a fight with the U.S, And no-one will say if he really sponsored terrorists. But he does have oil and lots of it.
Now.. North Korea on the other hand HAS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, has tried to openly pick a fight with the U.S, and sponsors any thing that will bring the downfall of the United States! However........they have dogs and rice, no oil , so there is nothing to be gained, no money to be made. And by the time they send the first nuke to North America the *** hole in the White House will be retired. Now don't get me wrong, Saddam was a dictator, and history has taught us that most dictators are evil. But c'mon! Does Bush not have a personal agenda? It's too bad that young men and women have to die so an *** hole and his cronies can get rich!

Answer 4

We shouldn't have gone in the first place, but we can't turn back now or else it would be another Vietnam. At least now the soldiers get the respect they deserve, but the President and his money-hungry administration don't deserve any. The only way we can fix the Iraq problem is to impeach those who started it and elect somebody who has a plan to end the conflict, and bring our soldiers home.

Answer 5

Jeff you are like our media a few cards short of a deck. news flash WE ARE IN IRAQ. now stop whining about it and support our troops and not by buying some silly ribbon but by telling President Bush and the Senate to support them allow them to DO THERE JOBS and stop putting them on trial for what amounts to collage pranks remember WAR is not supposed to be nice fuzzy and pristine. it is in fact supposed to be ugly horrific and disdainful you are to try to avoid it but when it must be go all the way or don't go that's how i see it

Answer 6

Well, some people think we should. I personally think the whole Irak/Osama war is a failure. For people who support the war and this new 20,000 plus troops I have to say, shouldn't be you the one who goes and fight instead of sending someone else to the front? Shouldn't be your own money used to pay for the cost of the war and no my money? I personally think that whoever supports more war should go there, to die for being an idiot. Bush to th every front and to use all the money he steals everyday from the oil industry. Why don't you ask, should we impeach the president?

Answer 7

If you support President Bush and the War of Terror you should be in Iraq performing some service, either in the military if you are eligible or as a truck driver, or other support if you are too old or otherwise inelligible. There is no excuse to be sitting here if you support our President and his war.

Answer 8

My heart tells me no, but then my head takes over. We need to finish what we started- we owe it to the ones and their families who have already paid that ultimate price.
I think that if we do not, it is going to show a sign of weakness on our part, and might result in all these little countries ganging up and cause them to come to us to give us a taste of what they have been going thru.
That has always been my number one fear of us sticking our noses into another country's business. I hope that is all that it will ever amount to.
I wish with my heart though, that all of heros could come home tonight.

Answer 9

I have no love for my idiot president, but I support my troops 110%. No, we should not be in Iraq. It isn't any of our business anymore. Saddam is gone, they have their own government, and now they have their own civil war. We should not have gotten involved, but we did, and now it is time to GET OUT.

Answer 10

In my opinion, no. I think that we went in there unecessarily, and have stayed there unecessarily. If we have this huge "War on Terror" then we should be in the Sudan helping the refugees of Darfur, and in numerous locations across Africa. We should really be in every country, including our own.

I can't understand it, and while I don't support the president, I do support the troops. Regardless of whether or not they should be there, they are there and they need their country behind them. Not behind their actions, behind them as people. Especially since so many more people will be going there in the next few weeks.