is it possible than a quater of all Californians are undocumented & if so how likely is to deport them ???

Question

i mean realistically , is it not a waste of time to try to get them Deported since they are essecial for the economy of this state which is one of the most important States for the nation ???

also which would be wiser to try to make them pay the taxes which they will have to pay once they are legalized or to not allow them to stay and lose all that money ???

Answer 1

The estimate for illegal immigrants moving into California was around 100,000 in the year 1993 but the total number of undocumented people residing in California is much higher. Twenty-five percent seems like a reasonable estimate but I wouldn't be surprised if this was on the low end. Therefore, given this large number, the likelihood of deporting all of them is incredibly low. The fact of the matter is that such a large deportation as that would ultimately cost the taxpayers of California (and the rest of the nation) millions if not billions. That isn't including the severe impact the loss of labor would have on our economy. A much better solution would be to let them stay at their own risk but if they are caught deport them immediately. Our secondary course of action should be to crack down on border security to prevent the transport of illegal and dangerous people/weapons into the US.

Answer 2

It is an unrealistic situation. California more than other states relies on them, their working, their taxes, their purchasing power! Im not sure I agree that it is a 1/4 of all Cali, but If they tried to do a massive deportation I feel for all the legal immigrants and citizens that happen to be hispanic, and what this means to them. What will the govt do to their rights if ICE is breaking into peoples homes? Will their be massive law suits? You better believe it!

Answer 3

No I dont believe the number is that high.

Even if they did pay taxes the amount of money they cost would be more.

I think its a waste of resources to try and track down illegals. Deport the ones who are arrested of course. But I wouldnt bother trying to track down the rest.

Instead eliminate the 'anchor baby' problem with either clarification or amendment.
Heavily fine and suspend licenses of those businesses caught employing illegals. revoke license if appropriate.
No health care beyond emergency care should be given to an illegal.
No free education benefits to illegals.
No welfare of any kind to illegals.

Attrition. If you take away the incentive to come to the USA illegaly, then they will quit doing it. They will either come legally or not at all.
Except for the criminals such as drug dealers of course and those can be dealt with.

Answer 4

The majority of them are on welfare, getting help from the state government and now they are going to get free health care, the governor already sign the Bill. The problem is not if they pay taxes or not, the question is, are they here legal or illegally, do they deserve to be in the USA or not. All the government have to do is to implement the immigration laws already in the books and the illegal aliens will go back home voluntary. If the government don't take action, you will see California again with a deficit that will turn into bankrupt in the future, is that what the Californians want. God help the state of California.

Answer 5

I agree with you that it is next to impossible. The government will not deport 20,000,000 people. If they had wanted to deport undocumented workers they would have done it years ago which would have deterred so many people from coming. The government needs and wants these people here.

Answer 6

First - I oppose illegal immigration.

That being said - it is a MYTH that illegals don't pay taxes.

They gain employment using phony SS numbers and DO have taxes withheld like everybody else. The difference is - they don't file returns, so the government keeps the taxes that were withheld because there are no tax refunds on that money.

Like I said - I'm opposed to illegal immigration - but let's all stick to the facts in voicing that opposition.

Answer 7

It would cost a lot to deport them all. Immigrants legal or illegal pay taxes and sorry but a bunch of airheads are answering your questions.

Answer 8

with the exception of each and each and every of the random silliness about telling this undesirable soul to go away...i will attempt to shout over the provincial "THEY TOOK OUR JOBS!" uninformed yokels who not in any respect took a macroeconomics class. California (Nevada and Colorado to boot-- perchance others) has a "secure Harbor" regulation about undocumented immigrants. contained when it comes to against the law hostile to an undocumented worker, the police are forbidden from inquiring for residency documentation. The motive of this regulation is to maintain away from precisely what seems occurring right here -- basically because we've not gotten round to arising federal statutes that are as a lot as date to economic theories flushed out over 2 hundred years in the past, would not propose that those who're searching for a much better existence ought to ought to pay the cost, bodily or financially. with regards to "me2's" remark, at the same time as the defendant can (and likely might want to) say something to mission the accuser, the secure Harbor regulation negates any accusation with regards to citizenship/residency for 2 causes: a million.) Federal regulation with regard to the amassing of suggestions for an ordeal negates the utilization of what to that end is entirely insubstantial; the status of the accuser. CA's sexual harrassment guidelines don't have any certain stipulation as to the kinds of human beings of qualify for protection less than sexual harrassment guidelines. Blue eyes, pink hair, 3 hands, residency status, etc. (to succeed in this can likely be unconstitutional less than both state and Fed guidelines besides.) 2.) A prosecutor can purely convey expenditures hostile to someone if there is information of wrongdoing. (it truly is that entire 'habeus corpus' constitutionality that Bush has been attempting to usurp) because the state police are forbidden from inquiring for information of residency status, the courts can not convey expenditures hostile to her. Her alleged assaulter has the right to "face the accuser," which basically signifies that he because the right to look after himself hostile to expenditures presented earlier him, not that he has the right to go back with thoroughly inconsequential distinct "insults" -- calling her fat, unlawful, Latina, in spite of. If this were not the case, then the total objective of the secure Harbor regulation might want to be moot. She is secure, and may precise this second record with close by authorities.

Answer 9

Why? I detect a hint of arrogance here, but I think the wiser thing to do is to do away with the red tape that the system that WOULD allow them to become legal immigrants is full of so they wouldn't have to come here illegally. Either that or give them amnesty.

Answer 10

Essensial to the ecomony? Are you kidding me?

They don's pay in and they drain all of the programs!

They are bankrupting the medical establishment and making it very difficult for CITIZENS to get the services I pay taxes for!

Go to the welfare department some time and tell me they are contributing. 95% of the people there are illegals. You won't see many white faces, or black ones either for that matter.

There kids are in our schools, which are struggling because so few of the citizens are tax paying ones.

It would cost us a chuck to deport them all, but it would be just that, a chunk payment. The money we would save makes up for it real quick. Also, all of our liberal social programs would stand a chance, AND help those whom it is intended to help./