How close are we to a United North America between the US, Mex and Canada?

Answer 1

I am truely hoping Canada will stand with the American citizens. I beleive they are going to try and convince us it's "the right thing to do: or that this chaos is beyond what we could fix without doing this.

Right now, South America is making deals with the mid-east. The "border" between South America and Mexico is less difficult than the border between Mexico and the US. Problem is the ties and culture and everything else is closer between Mexico and South America. America is more connected to Canada than Mexico. Mexico is more connected to South America than America. If there were to be a land war.....it would be best to go through Mexico before they got here if you were only looking for our best interest. Mexico runs on 3 things. Oil, drugs and money from the US. The drug cartel is based from south America..They are being faced between the 2 governments that sustain them. US is allowing massive immigration and they still have to face their "culture" in order to make a decision. I wouldn't blink twice about joining with Canada. To me Mexico isn't close at all to us. It's a FOREIGN country. Even if Mexico signs on......I would never trust them. There is too powerful a group funding the radical side that is too close to communisum and the east or middle east or South America. The fact that LaRaza is here, MeCha is here.....sorry.....it's warning flags. I hope to God I am dead by then and that isn't far away.

Answer 2

I think the lax enforcement of immigration law gives you an answer as does the propaganda stating that these 3rd World peasants supposedly do the jobs Americans won't do, but in reality they are suppressing wages, unions and getting around the onerous taxes and regulations that the state governments and federal government have in place when you hire an American citizen.

For some reason the Bush I, Bush II and Clinton thought that this country would be stronger if we had a North American Union to counter the EU. I harken back to the days of Henry Ford who made a fortune off of paying his workers a more than reasonable wage at that time so that they could afford the products that they had a part in manufacturing. It's not like that anymore.

Answer 3

Not very close as of today, but the globalization movement may hasten a trip to the poor house for all three nations.

With the bulk of manufacturing moving offshore (away from the Americas) it is only a matter of time before we all find that our rice bowls are empty.........

If we don't control our trade imbalances, restore our manufacturing base, and stop expending bucks on military expeditions that we can ill afford, we could become the new Ethiopia, Darfur, or Somalia.

The pols in D.C. are fiddling while we are burning to the ground....and Asia will be the one to rub salt in our ashes...........

Answer 4

At their meeting in Waco, Texas, at the end of March 2005, U.S. President George W. Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox, and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin committed their governments to a path of cooperation and joint action.

In March 2005, the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States adopted a Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPP), establishing ministerial-level working groups to address key security and economic issues facing North America and setting a short deadline for reporting progress back to their governments. President Bush described the significance of the SPP as putting forward a common commitment "to markets and democracy, freedom and trade, and mutual prosperity and security." The policy framework articulated by the three leaders is a significant commitment that will benefit from broad discussion and advice. The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.

To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity.

We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.

Bush`s daddy first proposed this in 1991.......
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=14965

Not yet sin.....but who knows

Answer 5

I am getting tired of seeing this and variations of this question. This is bogus. I live in Canada. This place and American blogs are the only places this is even talked about. Canada would not, now or ever, drop it's sovereignty to join the USA. Somebody has made this up to further discredit George Bush. This is NOT going to happen.

Jay NAFTA has been in place for 15 years

Answer 6

Not at all. Canada offers America (the only part of this equation that makes any sense) nothing really. Plus Mexico is already trying to suckle at America's teat. We're going to stop that soon though.

Plus your question is not completely right, since North America technically contains all of Central America, and NOBODY wants all that.

Answer 7

Preeettty far.

We are going to war with Iran first, and that should be a much, much, bigger concern for anyone trying to plan for the future.

Nuclear bombs are going to explode. Maybe after several American cities are gone, we will see more need for north american unification. We will need mexican soldiers and canadian resources.

Of course, America would be lost by then to tyrannical dictators. Anyone capable of thinking enough to ask a question like this one will have been long killed by followers of Toby Keith, the dictator puppet of Pat Robertson.

Answer 8

I think once Bush is out it is impossible. Have you written your Congressmen to ask them to vote down the Social Security accord which would give Mexicans who work here, including illegal immigrants, social security benefits?

These agreements only make sense when the same number, roughly, travel from each country to the other, and when the benefits and vesting schedules are equivilent, none of which are the case here.

Answer 9

Faaaaaaaaaaaaaaar away.


When Greece and Portugal entered the EU 25 years ago French and Germans accepted than a small and poor (relative
to them) country can say NO to their decisions.
Can USA accept such a thing?


.

Answer 10

Not very I hope. Canada is happy being its own country, Mexico, wants to stay its own country - though they want their people here to take our jobs to send cash back to their country -, and I don't know too many folks in the U.S. who would be too cool with the idea.