English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

31 answers

Not if she's worth having a relationship with.

2007-01-11 08:47:48 · answer #1 · answered by TeriR 6 · 0 0

It shouldn't. Women who are turned off by such a superficial thing as a birthmark are women you don't want to be around.

2007-01-11 16:48:31 · answer #2 · answered by Richard B 7 · 1 0

I dont think it would be a great concern. Watch the movie Animal House. There is a character in the movie they call Pinto for obvious reasons. He didnt seem to have a hard time getting the ladies.

2007-01-11 16:48:47 · answer #3 · answered by Squeegee 5 · 0 0

Not at all, strange place for a birthmark though assuming its where I think it is! But hey, it's what you do with it that counts know what I mean?

2007-01-11 17:00:36 · answer #4 · answered by Littlehoneybee 2 · 0 1

90% of women have celluilite, and many have stretch marks, and their partners dont mind, so why should a birthmark bother a woman? unless she was way superficial.

2007-01-11 16:52:23 · answer #5 · answered by Sarah A 3 · 2 0

Probably not. If women can accept uncut men - they can accept anything. Uncut is much much more gross than any birthmark could be.

2007-01-11 16:48:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Not unless he was walking around with it hanging out & then it would be the attitude that put me off!!!!!!!!!!! Chill, its not a problem

2007-01-11 16:53:47 · answer #7 · answered by la.bruja0805 4 · 1 0

no, that would be kinda cute...

its only a birthmark!!

2007-01-12 01:17:45 · answer #8 · answered by Auroraini 2 · 0 0

no - they are not likely to get a close up view at first and by the time they did they would like you for yourself

2007-01-11 16:51:52 · answer #9 · answered by D B 6 · 0 0

NOO its reli wouldent i think its cute and makes you ifferent hopefull you can help with my question two :)

2007-01-11 16:59:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers