English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Bush as in George W. Bush

2007-01-11 07:25:26 · 13 answers · asked by blacknight887 1 in Politics & Government Military

13 answers

Yep.

2007-01-11 07:30:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Like someone else said, they never tell the public everything. I'm still wondering why America is stillin the war while England and everyone else is getting ready to pull out. I mean I've heard it's for terrorism, oil, bin laden, to help the people there. Well I think we should be using our money to help the people in our own country before we start trying to impose democracy onto someone else's country.I'm sort of in the middle to whether it's the right thing because we already have so many over there and I'm wondering if the small number will be enough to help. I really hope this works out though, because if it doesn't a lot of lives will have been lost in vain.

2007-01-11 15:51:27 · answer #2 · answered by angelicasongs 5 · 0 0

Bush is not doing the correct thing by sending in more troops. We did that in Vietnam and all it did was get more of us killed. Then we lost Vietnam. Same will happen in Iraq. Stay tuned.

2007-01-11 15:39:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. We Should Get those soldiers out of there.

It was Bush's Own fault in the first place, messing with The Al Quaeda? Afghan people are easily underestimated, they stopped the british without America's Help, didnt they?

2007-01-11 15:33:45 · answer #4 · answered by ஜº°Trinity-Infynity°ºஜ 2 · 0 0

Anyone who really thinks this is going to work is a fool. It will buy him another couple of years at war so he can dump it on someone else. It's funny to finally see Republicans coming out against this plan. I guess they are trying to save their political aasses when it turns 2008 and Iraq is still a mess.

2007-01-11 15:35:27 · answer #5 · answered by blast furnace 2 · 0 0

Sending young Americans to fight for an unwinnable proposition, especially when Bush AVOIDED the military. What a despicable person; too scared himself, but rich enough to buy out, then send other people's children;. He is evil.

2007-01-11 15:32:42 · answer #6 · answered by chunkymonkey 3 · 0 0

No - It's a bit late for that now. We need to just get the hell out of their. We should have built up when this first started.

Too bad Bush doesn't listen to his Generals, huh?

2007-01-11 15:30:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I am back and forth on it. I think there is much more going on that is hidden from the public. I try to have faith in him and hope he does the right thing!

2007-01-11 15:33:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I think at this point, it's the only choice we have. Pulling them all out now would be catastrophic.

2007-01-11 16:34:25 · answer #9 · answered by Dr. Quest 5 · 0 0

yes

2007-01-11 15:41:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers