I myself am a scientist and a creationist
i'm sure there will be a number of atheist answer too so for you guys I'll leave this
- the fosil record does not prove it - lots and lots of gaps and not one "missing link" fosil has ever been found
- DNA homolgy does not prove it - this only tells us that similar functioning parts are made from a similar blue print not that one must have come from another
- Embryogensis doesnt prove it - those picture you might have seen in Bio 101 text books that show we all develop the same in utero but then only at the end we change - was shown to be false only a few years later - btw that was done in the 1890s
- Early atmopheric science doesnt prove it - the experiment you probably remember from the 1950s - where someone "made" amino acids from a "supe" was shown only 10 years later that the atmosphere used was most likely wrong - nobody in that field today believes that was a correct assumption of early earths atomosphere
2007-01-11
04:03:39
·
7 answers
·
asked by
servant FM
5
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
thanks Laviathan - but actually if you knew many scientists you would know we dont know how to spellllll but to help you out - I have a few degrees and about 10 years of work - I make pharmaceuticals (probably spelled that wrong too) - you know those drugs you get at the pharmacy -
maybe you should go back and get that masters
2007-01-11
05:50:39 ·
update #1