2007-01-11 03:13:56 · 10 answers · asked by astro 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I'm not convinced either, we should have 3000 less cruise missles NOT 3000 dead soldiers
2007-01-11 08:58:08 · update #1
Listened to the Presidents speach...
The man appeared to be a Zombie, had difficulty reading from the Teleprompter.
FACT: This is NOT A WAR!!!
WAR??? Against whom???
It's a military action. If the goal is to quell opposition, basically by the Sunni's against the puppet govermnent, than the Pres.' plan is not only idioitic, it's just plan stupid.
(Obviously a Con!)
Win control of Iraq for the President of Iraq, whom has already agreed to be an ally of Iran... come on!!! This is a sham!
Eventually, the Sunni's will be 'Enemie, of Our Enemies', when we attack Iran, so why do we want to eleminate them?
The Gen in Bagdad says his troops are, "Killing Sunni's, and Shites!" Kinda stupid as that's what their doing- killing each other! The Americans are preventing these Fighters from murdering each other, so they attack un-armed civilans as an alternative!
We need to get the Hell outta the way and let them cull each other out! This is developing into another Cambodia, or Rawanda. It's a wildfire that's jumped the break!
Than, if the Bad Guys... (And who are they, the Iranian allies, or the Ex-Saddamists?) win, bomb them!
Portarying that we don't have enough troops is a farce... we've got the Air Force, and the Navy Air Corp. Get the Army, and Marines the heck outtta the way and let air power do it's thang!
Finally, despite all the hocus-pocus, pomp and circumstance, this opperation was a huzzel from the get-go. Bush is nothing but a high faluttin' Con Artist. Quite treating him with respect, as if this were a legit "War", and start treating him with the contempt any other common criminal, like Ken Lay, Tom Delay, or Abrhamoff deserve. He's just anothered feathered crook!!!
2007-01-11 03:45:40 · answer #1 · answered by activistatreformautosdotorg 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bush's speech last night only re-affirmed my thoughts about this moron that he has to be the dumbest President we ever had and is willing to gamble our Tax dollars that would be better spent here in America on Americans, and to run the risk of more of our kids dying merely to somehow manage to save a questionable egacy that went out the window when he invaded a soverign nation that was of absolutely no threat to this country!
2007-01-11 03:26:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not.....I am not really sure anyone has the answer for this mess. I mean lets face it I do not think that a complete withdrawal is the answer right now and I don't agree with the war either so I have no clue other than it is a disastrous mess!
2007-01-11 03:24:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not at all. The solution is to rebuild the country and help its people get jobs and back on their feet. They need work programs not more military might. But as is his style he believes he can force others to think like him.
2007-01-11 03:22:34 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, He just trying to make people believe in him again. He don't have a Republican congress anymore, let see what the Democrat are going to do now. He believe he can do what he wants as he did before.
2007-01-11 03:24:20 · answer #5 · answered by Koly 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The key is to help Iraq get new oil contracts and have Iraq profit 100% from it. Ever since the invasion of Iraq, Iraq's oil contracts were terminated and taken over by American and British oil companies in violation of the Geneva Conventions.
Now the US placed people in power in Iraq to vote to have US and British oil companies get 75% of profits of Iraq's oil for helping them drill it, and contract it out.
The war was meant to exploit the people from their oil reserves. The war was never meant to help them economically.
2007-01-11 03:37:52 · answer #6 · answered by Jerry H 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, this was a speech made for the his conscience. He knows he's wrong, but all he want to get big economical benefactors to get his goal, self enrichment and the clowns next to him.
2007-01-11 03:25:30 · answer #7 · answered by Javy 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well...more like a band aid on a gaping wound.
2007-01-11 03:38:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If anything, it made me start to believe in the opposite.
2007-01-11 03:21:16 · answer #9 · answered by Thetaxman 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No.
2007-01-11 03:20:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋