It has just be unvieled! 92,000 more troops to be sent to Iraq on top of the 21,000 currently ask for by Bush! That is a total of 113,000 more troops to Iraq! They also listed the expected engagement period! 5 YEARS more! AT THE LEAST!
I am totally totally against this! What do you think?
2007-01-11 03:07:37 · 13 answers · asked by MrKnowItAll 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
You sir are an idiot.
The 92,000 troop increase is for the implementation of 5 new brigades to increase OVERALL troop strength, They will not be sent to Iraq. By the time these brigades are formed, dumbo will be a distant memory and hopefully, we will have elected someone of intelligence and common sense.
Please rename yourself mrknowsomeofit....sortof
2007-01-11 03:58:51 · answer #1 · answered by tallerfella 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think there's alot of tears in your beer. Sound just a little bit like a cry baby. Too chicken to fight for freedom and yet, you want freedom of speech.
What part of total freedom are you also against? When did you turn into a total wuss and think it was the god given right for everyone else to die for you, just so you could have freedom of speech. Ever think about the aspect, that we're getting sick and tired of fighting for loosers such as yourself?
I know, why can't we all just get along together. Why can't we just sit down and have a little chit chat with all the good little terrorist.Ask Jimmy Carter about his talks with the little fat boy in North Korea. They really worked out well didn't they?
Personally, I would like to send your butt over to Iran and have you chit chat with little hitler. Little Hitler, would be able to spot your yellow streak a mile away.
2007-01-11 11:26:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The 92K is an increase in overall troop strength, not 92K additional troops sent to Iraq.
2007-01-11 11:14:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're full of it, but at least that would be the right direction.
No amount of troops will help unless they open up the ROE (Rules of Engagement) and let us light people up.
Fear is a GREAT motivator.
2007-01-11 11:16:04 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bring home the troops.
2007-01-11 11:14:30 · answer #5 · answered by peter s 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If only Bush and Rummy had listened to there generals four years ago.
2007-01-11 11:16:38 · answer #6 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If that is what it takes to win, great.
I will accept that you are against it only if you can provide a plan to win. Otherwise, you are nothing more than a critic who complains.
2007-01-11 11:15:57 · answer #7 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they have to bring back the draft, I wonder how many gung-ho warriors will be around then?
2007-01-11 11:17:14 · answer #8 · answered by Feathery 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they should send 350,000 more troops and change the ROE.
2007-01-11 11:11:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wrong again... they want to increase the number of soldiers in the military by 92,000, not in Iraq.
Please do your research before you come screaming here in hysterics. Thanks.
2007-01-11 11:12:57 · answer #10 · answered by theearlybirdy 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋