During the cold war we developed a weapon called the neutron bomb. This was a nuke with a low blast but very high radiation yield, designed to kill people but leave buildings intact.
Where are they now.
We could pull our troops and allies out of these crackpot countries, use the neutron bomb, decontaminate then go in and grab whatever, or even colonise some of these places with our own people.
Multiple benefits, rid the world of these maniacs, stabilise the regions, and reduce the world population.
What do you think?
2007-01-11 02:39:43 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Hey we nuked Japan twice remember, we've done this before we can do it again.
China would get a cut of the Oil and would back us against the soviets ( who would use it as an excuse to do the same to Chechnya).
No one in the west or Europe gives a fig about the middle east apart from oil. We have been trying to get rid of them for centuries, now's our chance.
2007-01-11 03:08:16 · update #1
Iraq-- Have the Iraqi government take more responsibility.
Iran-- Don't worry about them until they can develop a suitcase size bomb that doesn't emit an radiation. That is several years away.
N Korea-- Tell China they need to handle this one. They are the only one with influence over NK. Short of dropping a nuke on Pong Yang There's nothing we are going to do that will end the idiocy there. And that would probably make China mad.
2007-01-11 03:03:51 · answer #1 · answered by namsaev 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it weren't for all the oil over there we rely on, we probably could have economically put them down like was done with the Soviets.
Past history says NOTHING has an easy solution though.
2007-01-11 10:46:15 · answer #2 · answered by bradxschuman 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
One word, Civilians.
What do you mean the Soviets? The Soviet Union died over 10 years ago.
2007-01-11 10:42:45 · answer #3 · answered by D.O... 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you know what Russia and China would do? They would not support that at all and probably consider it a threat.
@above ignoring the enemy isn't a good tactic...
2007-01-11 10:45:02 · answer #4 · answered by AlienJack J 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think you're an idiot for coming up with such an idea. The neo Nazis would be proud of you.
2007-01-11 10:48:49 · answer #5 · answered by flip4449 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It makes much more sense than IGNORING THEM. What moron can realistically accept that from barbarians?
2007-01-11 11:01:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The best and only solution is just leave them alone by ignoring them.
2007-01-11 10:43:35 · answer #7 · answered by Kiran 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋