Also, if they are illegal immigrants wouldn't you be more concerned with getting work than turning a church into a mosque.
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1053
2007-01-11 01:30:33 · 16 answers · asked by Abdul 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
"biased media coverage". It's a blog... with photos!
2007-01-11 01:39:15 · update #1
Katie - fair enough. I apologise
2007-01-11 01:40:28 · update #2
Boy, are you really in left field here. The church opens it's doors and offers santuary to those who don't have a place to worship, shows charity and what it means to be Christian, and you mock them! England is primary protestant, which hates Catholicism. This artical was aimed for just what you took from it, to mock and degrade Catholics, but instead, it shows our charity.
2007-01-11 01:40:19 · answer #1 · answered by sister steph 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Do you know the difference between Immigrants and illegal immigrants? One comes here and they are entitled to work. They arrive with all their documents, like a passport and they will work to gain a little respect from this country.
Illegal Immigrants arrive on the back of a lorry. They don't carry any documents as they don't want to prove what country they are from. They are not entitled to work and they are not entitled to benefit.
Once you know what ones you are talking about then reword your question and explain what you want us to answer.
2007-01-11 01:45:35 · answer #2 · answered by Tabbyfur aka patchy puss 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Allowing immigrants to use the Church is a good thing.
Allowing practise of a false religion is not.
2007-01-11 06:25:44 · answer #3 · answered by Resident Genius 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Giving sanctuary to anyone in a church is ok, but trying to change the religion........... that's a different story altogether! I don't think the same thing would go down too well in their own country.
2007-01-11 01:42:46 · answer #4 · answered by Polo 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
looks like charity is the segue between book Catholicism and true Christianity. And no, not if your society places more influence on church than work.
2007-01-11 01:39:38 · answer #5 · answered by tridentoftime 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That is beautiful
Those who have been driven out from their homes unjustly, only because they said, 'Our Lord is Allah.' And if Allah had not repelled some people by means of others, cloisters and churches and synagogues and mosques, wherein the name of Allah is oft remembered, would surely have been destroyed. And Allah will, surely, help him who helps Him. Allah is, indeed, Powerful, Mighty -
2007-01-11 01:35:22 · answer #6 · answered by MUHAMMAD 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
That's interesting
2007-01-11 01:34:14 · answer #7 · answered by your_name_here 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The church can't get over the fact that they are not politically powerful as they used to be....
They try to get involved in any ridiculous cause they can.
2007-01-11 01:34:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
You do not say what the 'THIS' is that proves Catholics are stupid.
Why generalise, though? I am pleased you said SOME.
2007-01-11 02:29:00 · answer #9 · answered by alan h 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What!
You mean that people who believe in a big sky fairy are not capable of rational thought??????
No Sh1t, Sherlock!!
p.s. before anyone thinks I am anti-catholic, I dont think catholics are any more stupid than baptists, mormons, hindus, anglicans, etc, etc, etc, ad nauseum
2007-01-11 01:36:57 · answer #10 · answered by Peppers_Ghost 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋