Quran ,yet the quote the same Bible( corupt ands changed) to proove quran is right !! What kind of logic is that ??After doing this why they expect to take them serios ,right ?? :))
2007-01-11 00:13:38 · 18 answers · asked by bia b 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
fagie ,what I asked and what u answered . Have u really read my question or u just tried to avoid an straight answer .In fact I have seen u manny times saying Bible is corupt ,last time it was today on Miriams question . I expect to see u later quoting the same "corupt " and changed " Bible to proove Mohamed was foretold in the Bible ....how pathethic .
2007-01-11 00:25:10 · update #1
muslims_teacher 333 ur estatement only makes me lough . Is not ur God who teached u that . Look who teached u that : 5. In 1064, Ibn-Khazem, FIRST charged that the Bible had been
corrupted and the Bible falsified. This charge was to defend
Islam against Christianity because Ibn-Khazem come upon
differences and contradiction between the Bible and the
Quran. Believing, by faith that the Quran was true, the Bible
must then be false. He said, "Since the Quran must be true it
must be the conflicting Gospel texts that are false.
Now look what ur Quran say abt Bible .
1. The Quran declares the Bible to be a true revelation of
God and demands faith in the Bible.
Sura 2:40-42,126,136,285; 3:3,71,93; 4:47,136; 5:47-51,
69,71-72; 6:91; 10:37,94; 21:7; 29:45,46; 35:31; 46:11
a. All these above texts presuppose the availability of the
true revelation of God to the people of Muhammad's day.
Sura 3:71,93; 10:94; 21:71
b. A true Muslim is obliged to believe in all the revelation
2007-01-11 00:34:25 · update #2
muslim_teacher 333 u talk again nonsense, Where is the" original "Bible that u muslims believe in ??? I tell u . NOWHERE. U muslims dont have any "original" Bible to proove that our Bible is wrong . U only have the word of a man but no proof.But we DO have proofs that our Bible is NOT "changed and corupt" becouse we have the real original Bible thats The Manuscripts from Dead Sea that are kept in Jerusalem Museum. I challenge u to take a trip there and convince urself that NO WORD has been changed in the Bible. But anyway this was not my question if Bible is true or not ,the question was why u quote from our "corupt and changed " Bible to proove islam is right ? For example u quote the Bible as the source of the truth when u muslims try to proove Mohamed was foretold in the Bible . So Mohamed was foretold in a corupt book, right ?? how pathethic .....
2007-01-12 00:58:54 · update #3
abelkhouche ,u will never see a christian quoting the Quran to proove The Bible is right ,not to proove that Jesus is Son of God ,we dont need Quran to proove that but u muslims quote The Bible to proove that Mohamed is a prophet of God ,so Mohamed is foretold in a corupted book isnt it ?? When we quote from Quran we do it only to proove Quran is wrong and is not the word of God but we never quote Quran to proove christianity is right .
2007-01-12 01:09:29 · update #4
capn edib . Do u understand english ???My question was why u muslims quote The Bible when it fits with Quran and ignore and call "corupt and changed " the rest of Bible that doesnt fit with Quran . This is the question ,so if u dont have any answer to this question plz speare me of long copy pasts from islamic propaganda sites which doesnt have anything to do with my question ..
2007-01-12 01:15:40 · update #5
mlaheji , how conveniant to call" the truth "what it seems to agree with Quran and to ignore and call "change and corupt " what doesnt agree with Quran ,isnt it ???
Did u know that Satan is doing exatly the same work ?? Use The Bible ( the word of God) when is convenient for him ,just to deceive people ,and call the word of God as a lie to proove himself righteous .
2007-01-12 01:23:53 · update #6
I've been wondering the same thing. They even use quotes from the Bible to try and prove (very poorly) that Muhammad is a prophet. There is no logic or need for the Quran. Jesus fulfilled prophecy and foretold all. They should believe that.
May God Bless you.
2007-01-11 00:23:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
The Quran and the Bible are both Holy books in the sense that they were about someone who either was a messiah or a prophet. The Quran is said to have been written by Mohammed while the Bible has many authors and tells the story of a people who have an agreement with God which through their individual and collective efforts attempt to maintain this sacred relationship. Muslim's feel very close to the word of Mohammed throught the Quran which is attributed to him where as the Bible has many
spiritual revelations from a series of Prophets ending with Jesus the Messiah.The muslims may believe the Bible's weakness is that it not entirely the word of God owing to the may authors and different cannons in and out of the Bible.
2007-01-11 00:30:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
nicely, you would possibly want to imagine so, yet right it truly is the adaptation between the Quran and the Bible... The Bible underwent many distinct translations and revisions without conserving the originals in tact. The Quran has also gone through many distinct translations and revisions, however those who've worked on the translations have not in any respect altered the unique and maximum comprise the unique Arabic script alongside with those translations. also, besides the actual incontrovertible fact that not a lot of human beings use Classical Arabic lately, it is nonetheless a residing language. Aramaic, the language of Jesus (saws) died previously, and shall we purely guess what languages the prophets earlier him spoke. besides the actual incontrovertible fact that mainstream Christians received't admit to it, even many Christians agree that the Bible in use precise this second is not the unique note of God, and the Catholic church in Europe has determined now to not use it as a real account of historic activities. even if the Quran hadn't suggested that the Bible were altered, i might want to nonetheless discover adequate information precise this second to come back to the end that it has.
2016-12-02 03:07:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.
It does not befit a truthful man that God should give him the Book and Wisdom and Prophethood, and then he should say to men, 'Be my worshippers instead of God; but he would say, 'Be solely devoted to the Lord because you teach the book and because you study it.
Nor does it befit him that he should bid you to take the angels and the Prophets for lords. What! Would he enjoin you to disbelieve after you have submitted to God.
And remember the time when Allah took a covenant from the people through the Prophets, saying, 'Whatever I give you of the Book and Wisdom and then there comes to you a Messenger, fulfilling that which is with you, you shall believe in him and help him.' And He said, 'Do you agree, and do you accept the responsibility which I lay upon you in this matter?' They said, 'We agree.' He said, 'Then bear witness and I am with you among the witnesses.'
Now whoso turns away after this, then, surely, those are the transgressors.
Do they seek a religion other than Allah's, while to Him submits whosoever is in the heavens and the earth, willingly or unwillingly, and to Him shall they all be returned?
Say, 'We believe in Allah and that which has been revealed to us, and that which was revealed to Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac and Jacob and the tribes, and in that which was given to Moses and Jesus and other Prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them and to Him we submit
2007-01-12 21:08:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
What?
Were only trying to prove stuff from what you believe in.
============
We believe the Bible was sent by God, but has been corrupted (not completely) by man. Since some people still do take it seriously and believe in it more than anything else, we show them stuff from that.
2007-01-11 11:55:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Dear lady, if you don't believe the Quran, then what do you have to say about the following critics, historians who are NOT MUSLIMS ??
" We do not know of any book in the whole world less authenticated as to date, authers' names or tradition than our own christian Bible "--[ Isis Unveiled by Blavatsky, vol. II, p-277 ]
" ..That the historic Jesus is something different from the Jesus Christ of the doctrine of the two natures, seems to us now selfevident. "--[ The Quest ]of the Historical Jesus by A. Schweitzer, translated by Montgomery F.C.Burki p3-4 ]
It can also be observed that one of the writers of The New Testament, one of the premier saints of Christianity, represents Jesus an illegitimate son of a ghost whom the saint considers , "holy", but whom some others think an " unholy demon " as he evidently brings about vices like " folly, adultry, frivolity, lewdness,......"--[ The Asatir by M.Gaster, p-132 ]
Carl Sagan (Scientist; Author)...............
"My long-time view about Christianity is that it represents an amalgam of two seemingly
immiscible parts--the religion of Jesus and the religion of Paul. Thomas Jefferson attempted to
excise the Pauline parts of the New Testament. There wasn't much left when he was done, but it
was an inspiring document." (Letter to Ken Schei [author of Christianity Betrayed]
Thomas Jefferson ...............
"Paul was the first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus." (All references not listed here, can be
found in Christianity Betrayed)
Walter Kaufmann (Professor of Philosophy, Princeton) .......
"Paul substituted faith in Christ for the Christlike life."
Carl Jung (Psychologist) ..........
"Paul hardly ever allows the real Jesus of Nazareth to get a word in." (U.S. News and World
Report, April 22, 1991, p. 55)
" We know very little about Jesus. The evangelists have daubed his life image so thickly with supernatural colours that the natural colours can not be restored. The Jesus of history is simply a problem and a problem can not be object of faith."--[ Dr. Straus quoted in Christ's Myth.]
And plz don't be so pathetic about Mohammad for having been foretold in the scriptures.......
"......Furthermore it is declared that the coming of Mohammad under the name of 'AHMAD' and that his name is specifically recorded in 'TAWRAH' and 'INJIL' as the prophet of GENTILES [ an-nabi, ul-ummi, interprated by later orthodox as the 'unlettered prophet'] Nevertheless, the Jews [ and perhaps by implication, the Christians also seek to conceal the witness of thier scriptures and are guilty of misquoting and even wilfully perverting them."--[Moahammadanism, An Historical Survey, by Hamilton A.R.GIBB,pg-53]
Thus Christians have been over zealous in declaring Bible as being corrupted and altered, a fact which you can overlook but can not deny.
You have no right to blame the Muslims ,for they respect Jesus as one of the prophets sent by God.
It is becoz of the alterations & addition in the original Bible that made Jesus, the son of the God and even God.
2007-01-11 01:04:00 · answer #6 · answered by ♪¢αpη' ε∂ïß♪ ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It seems like a logic circle. Go around and around to prove that some is something because of something else that is proven by the first thing. After think about it my head hurts.
k1
2007-01-11 00:24:42 · answer #7 · answered by Kenneth G 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The true version of the Bible is hidden somewhere.Someday when it comes out,the truth will come out and those who hid it for worldly gains would be punished.
2007-01-11 00:26:29 · answer #8 · answered by Sadegh B 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
For the exact reason Christians say the same thing about the trappings of Islam religious dogma.
What else can each say? Religions just make up a bunch of crap and declare their own bunch of crap to be the only true and authentic bunch of crap, while every other religion’s crap is crap.
It is no different that children arguing about whose imaginary superhero is superior.
Well, it is different…. children do not generally rape, torture, and kill in order to prove how good, and pure, and true their imaginary beings are.
2007-01-11 00:21:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
I have a better question, why do Christians quote the Qur'an when they say it is corrupt? What kind of logic is that?
2007-01-11 00:24:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋