English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

what do you think?

2007-01-10 22:14:05 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health Diseases & Conditions Cancer

12 answers

I doubt it.

However, by spending money on things like an unjustified war, that money could be going to cancer research, and greatly increase our chances of finding a cure within the next 10 years.

2007-01-12 08:48:05 · answer #1 · answered by Denny T 2 · 0 0

No, they're not smart enough or partisan enough to keep such a major secret. :-D

Cancer myths and urban legends are so prevelant on the Internet that the American Cancer Society keeps track of them. The 'government is hiding the cure' is among the top ten myths about cancer.

Secret Cancer Cure Myth
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_11_1_Secret_Cancer_Cure_Myth.asp


The Top 10 Cancer Myths and Misunderstandings in the United States
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/PED_11_Cancer_Myths.asp

2007-01-11 14:38:59 · answer #2 · answered by Panda 7 · 0 0

NO. if there was a cure for cancer no government could withhold that information. Cures come from researcher not the government.
Cancer is a multi disease caused by a awry of conditions. It can't be cured unless they know what cause it.

An individual can be cured for a specfic cancer but no cure for the disease as a whole.

2007-01-11 19:42:51 · answer #3 · answered by wild4gypsy 4 · 1 0

Undoubtedly. A number of books indicate cancer is induced by way of a Selenium deficiency and other nutrient deficiencies. You are not able to find these minerals in usual foods, besides dietary Yeast, Blackstrap Molasses, Brazil nuts, and many others. (who eats these meals, anyway?). I do not suppose in single mineral supplementation as this process is not taken up by the body well (it is viewed synthetic to the physique for essentially the most part). Meals is your exceptional treatment, individually. Anyway, i am referencing a book known as "rare Earths: Forbidden treatments by using Joel D. Wallach, who has been no longer simplest a Veterinarian and cured melanoma in animals, but also grew to be an M.D. And obtained the equal outcome. On page 463, he mentions melanoma being the effect of selenium, tin, zinc, gallium, vitamin E (all forms) and beta carotene deficiencies. Anyway, first-class booklet to assert the least. The other factor to look at in cancer is a poisonous bowel. "As above, so below" goes the chinese pronouncing. If in case you have a poisonous bowel, you are going to have toxicity in the physique someplace else. This is very authentic of melanoma. Detoxify through cleaning the bowels, and get these rare minerals observed in "dietary Yeast" or Blackstrap Molasses and you're going to see growth. Anyway, just my spin on things as I see it. No pricey and possibly damaging process here......

2016-08-10 11:42:19 · answer #4 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

Cancer is worldwide. If the US Gov't knew of a cure, I'm sure other countries would also know. And why the heck would they want to hide a cure?

2007-01-10 22:23:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

honestly. numerous books element out maximum cancers is brought about with information from a Selenium deficiency and different nutrient deficiencies. you could't discover those minerals in prevalent ingredients, except nutritional Yeast, Blackstrap Molasses, Brazil nuts, etc. (who eats those ingredients, besides?). i don't believe in unmarried mineral supplementation as this technique isn't taken up with information from the body nicely (that's considered man made to the body for the most section). nutrition is your ideal drugs, for my section. besides, i'm referencing a e book called "uncommon Earths: Forbidden treatments with information from Joel D. Wallach, who has been not purely a Veterinarian and cured maximum cancers in animals, yet also became an M.D. and were given the same outcomes. On web page 463, he mentions maximum cancers being the outcome of selenium, tin, zinc, gallium, diet E (all kinds) and beta carotene deficiencies. besides, recommendations-blowing e book to assert the least. the different component to look at in maximum cancers is a poisonous bowel. "As above, so below" is going the chinese saying. once you've a poisonous bowel, you've toxicity contained in the body some position else. it truly is very real of maximum cancers. Detoxify with information from cleansing the bowels, and get those uncommon minerals cutting-edge in "nutritional Yeast" or Blackstrap Molasses and also you may see progression. besides, basically my spin on issues as I see it. No intense priced and likely risky approach right here......

2016-12-02 03:03:59 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

conspiracy theories are so much fun to research and discuss..but they're just entertainment there's not much meat behind most of them..especially when it comes to cancer. The government and the FDA would get insanely wealthy, they have every motive to find a cure why on earth would they hide it

2007-01-11 05:26:46 · answer #7 · answered by goldengirl 4 · 2 0

The last disease "cured" was Polio, and the "Polio business" went bankrupt overnight. This is one reason why they will never cure cancer, it makes the pharmaceutical companies and everyone else 2 much money. Cancer is a booming business. My fiance is 31 and has battled cancer since last Christmas, I wish there were a cure, I would give everything I have for it.

2007-01-11 05:15:16 · answer #8 · answered by michelle j 1 · 1 3

no
thoughi wont rule out the possibilty entirely

2007-01-10 22:21:30 · answer #9 · answered by poison_ivy_sam 4 · 0 1

No, I don't think they could keep it secret.

2007-01-10 22:22:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers