Is it true that you burn the same number of calories running a certain distance as you would do walking it?

Question

If so, why the heck are we wearing ourselves out with all this jogging?

Answer 1

No, you would not burn the same amount of calories walking a certain distance than running it. I walk and run at different times of the year, depending on the weather and what I feel like. You can get a good workout while walking if you vary your terrain and keep up a quick pace. Running or jogging that same distance makes you pump your arms and legs in order to propel you along, which in turn makes you work harder. The faster you move, the more muscles you are using at a higher rate. You will see overall body definition a lot sooner with running. With walking, the lower body will get a better definition that the upper body.

Answer 2

You could customarily burn more calories and would absolutely get extra cardio benefits from a 30-minute walk. The intent effortlessly being time - 7-eight minutes is not lengthy enough on your blood vessels to broaden absolutely, in your oxygen degree in the bloodstream to peak, and many others. You need no less than 20-30 minutes of improved heart price and respiratory to get cardio advantages. That being mentioned, depth undoubtedly burns extra calories, however what's excessive for one person could not be severe for yet another. A marathon jogging might jog a mile and may simplest burn a number of hundred calories whereas anybody who was once grossly out of form might burn 1,000 calories looking to run a mile. The first-class decide is your HEARTRATE. The marathon runner's heartrate would as a rule only expand slightly bit from a relaxed jog, whereas an overweight unfit character might have very high heartrate from doing the equal workout routines - so they might burn many extra calories. There is one ultimate variable which is the tie-breaker between high and low intensity exercises and that is the calorie burning that happens AFTER you conclude exercising. High intensity workout routines that last greater than half-hour (and i imply excessive depth, excessive heartrate, non-discontinue cardio) will proceed burning calories at an multiplied degree for up to 2-three HOURS after you stop figuring out. Low intensity workouts equivalent to strolling do not give this improvement.

Answer 3

Hey there, i have heard that many times also... In my job i walk for 3.5 hours a day and tho i love my food i still have to work out at the gym, even now i am struggle to loose the 1 stone i want 2. in my knowledge its the intensity of the workout that u do, and tho walking will burn cals running will burn more and get u fitter quicker and create muslcle which in turn needs more calories to feed it.. if u prefer walking i wud suggest u include a lot of hills to up the intensity or same if running, if u use the treadmill in gym as i do a lot use the incline button on and off , also its easier on your joints if u include some off road outside like over fields to prevent injurys... also its important to build up ur running gradually or it will seem hard... i am starting again myself once i rid my cold... Good luck ...

Answer 4

I heard the same thing, and I question it too. I realize that it take a lot longer to run a mile than to walk a mile. Remember that we burn energy just sleeping. If you burn 50 calories am hour watching tv and 200 running a mile. It takes an hour to run a mile and 2 hour walkin a mile. You would burn 250 running a mile and then going home to watch tv compared to 200 just walking the mile. THe numbers are definetely not accurate.

Answer 5

In school they taught us that Ek = m*v^2
Ek: kinetic Energy
m: mass
v: velocity

So the quicker you move, the more energy you use (and it grows proportional not to the speed, but to the square of the speed!), that's why your car eats more fuel when you're driving faster. And when you run, you use more calories than walking.

The second reason is physiological. When you walk, your body is in its usuall modus. When you run, your cells get "activated", your pulse gets quicker, and your body uses more energy. So you really lose more weight by jogging than by walking. In other words, the "wearing ourselves out" you mentioned is just the reason why jogging is better for losing weight.

If you nevertheless prefer walking to jogging, nobody stops you from doing it. In long narrow parks, such as the ones alongside rivers, I've seen as many people doing Nordic walking as jogging.

Answer 6

you may probable burn greater energy and might actual get greater cardio advantages from a 30-minute walk. the reason purely being time - 7-8 minutes isn't long sufficient on your blood vessels to enhance totally, on your oxygen point interior the bloodstream to top, and so on. you choose a minimum of 20-30 minutes of greater heart fee and respiratory to get cardio advantages. That being stated, intensity actual burns greater energy, yet what's severe for one individual could no longer be severe for yet another. A marathon working ought to jog a mile and could purely burn some hundred energy while somebody who replaced into grossly out of shape ought to burn a million,000 energy attempting to run a mile. the final choose is your HEARTRATE. The marathon runner's heartrate might probable purely strengthen purely a sprint from a cushty jog, while an obese undeserving individual could have very severe heartrate from doing a similar exercises - so they might burn many greater energy. there is one very final variable that's the tie-breaker between low and severe intensity exercises and that's the calorie burning that happens once you end exercising. severe intensity exercises that final greater effective than 30 minutes (and that i advise severe intensity, severe heartrate, non-cease cardio) will proceed burning energy at an greater point for as much as two-3 HOURS once you cease understanding. Low intensity exercises alongside with strolling do no longer provide this income.

Answer 7

No! You use more energy running.

Compare jumping up and down on the spot to just standing there. Jumping uses more energy right?

If you want the majority of the calories you burn to come from fat, for example if you want to lose weight then walk, as this is lower intensity.

If you get fitter then run! Or bike, swim, kayak, climb or play tennis.

Answer 8

I've been told the same thing and had tested the theory out on the tread mill so yes it is true! and the reason we jog and run in my opinion is it saves time, for example some people can run 10km in 45 mins yet walking might take 1.5hrs so i find in our busy life styles it better to run! it has its downfalls though for example stress on the joints so the decision is YOURS but remember anything is better than nothing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 9

Jogging get's your heart rate up higher than walking. Working out with a higher heart rate excersises your heart as well as your muscles, and burns more fat. More than just burning off the calories.

Answer 10

you can burn more calories walking only if you go on the treadmill and do the hill climb for the same amount of time that you would do running ,but be warned doing the hillclimb is harder than running cause when you run if you get past the pain barrier that time when your body is saying no more it gets alot easier.