Does the war in Iraq have anything to do with September 11?

Question

Many people say that they connect, but how?

Answer 1

Nope. It had to do with WMD's that were never found.

Answer 2

Well, the people involved with "The Project For the New American Century" were planning on an Iraq Invasion way before Bush II was elected. 9/11 just created an atmosphere in the US where Bush & Co. could convince the Congress and the people to support an invasion that was already in the works.

Iraq had nothing to do with the attacks on 9/11.

Answer 3

now and returned I ought to chortle with regard to the lunacy of anti-conflict protesters. while Bush first attacked Iraq he had a Presidential approval score interior the mid ninety% and now that's interior the mid 30%. His stance on Iraq did no longer substitute however the fickleness of the yank human beings did. the subject with the conflict in Iraq is the reality that we combat it on the night information. If an harmless iraqi gets a hang nail via fact of an American mishap we start up crying how inhuman the conflict is!!! The troops battling in Iraq love President Bush and that they suspect they're battling for a reason. it quite is the tree-huggers decrease back interior the state who make those human beings's strikes monsterous. I hate listening to human beings say issues like "I help the troops, yet i do no longer help the conflict." what style of bullshit is this. Your fellow human beings are putting their lives on the line each and each and known and you're able to make their commintment out to be meaningless. So, enable's fake for a 2d. President Bush has been professional-conflict via fact the commencing up. The Democrats in Congress had overwhelming supported the President and the conflict. Now, they're asserting that they have got been incorrect. that they had made a mistake. they ought to alter their song as election day procedures!!! yet, if I have been incorrect and that i had made a mistake which delivered approximately 3,000 American deaths i could be imprisoned and placed on death row. people who supported the conflict and now withdraw that help must feel embarrassment approximately themselves. they ought to surrender from place of work considering that is sparkling their comments substitute with the winds of recent opnion. you won't be able to run a usa based on the main recent ny cases public opinion poll.

Answer 4

From what I've gathered most people can't even distinguish the difference between Iraq and Afghanistan, Some fanatics hopped on a plane and did a kamikaze. Bin Laden claims he did it.. but you notice every time a suicide bomber kills 100 people 20 different organizations claim it.. so who knows who really did it. The weps. of mass destructions was our reasoning for going to Iraq, then it went to saving the people.. For the most part all I've seen is dead civilians..

As for terrorism its a tactic not a person, say for example if korea came here to purge us of our government.. and dropped a bomb on my house.. killed my kids my family.. I would be a little resentful towards the Korea wouldn't you think?

Now before you read this and start to criticize me, I support our troops 100%, I just don't support the cause.. I would like every one of them to come home safe

Answer 5

Easy. US troops were in Saudi Arabia to fend off Saddam. Extemist Muslims are irate because infidel Americans are in their holy land. They decide to punish America for that and for Western influence in general (they greatly fear things like freedom and knowledge). The US needed to do something to change the status quo in the long running standoff with Iraq so they went in to take out Saddam. That is what 9/11 has to do with Iraq.

Answer 6

In virtually every speech Bush has given in the past few years he has mentioned Iraq and 9/11 and usually in the same sentence. There is no such connection. Its the neo cons who want everybody to think that there is.

Answer 7

No connection. We're fighting in Iran as a New World Order objective set forth by the Illuminati for which Bush serves.

Answer 8

Not directly. The invasion of Iraq was based on faulty intel data accusing Hussein of having so-called WMDs. Of course, none was found so other excuses had to be made up to justify Dubya's error. Hussein was found to have had nothing to do with Al Queda.

Answer 9

Nothing at all - It was planned before 9/11

Answer 10

Terrorists exist. They don't tell us, they shout it to us.

Consider this about troop withdrawal:

Ok, may I give you a point of view if you read between the lines:

The 20,000 troops are needed because our men and women are exhausted. They have been doing double duty, and in order to bring them home, they need support now.

Would you deny them support now?

Don't you see (maybe) that this is the way we need to bring our troops home? We must not leave those there without the help needed to keep them safe now.

When you are exhausted, don't you see how others are needed to pick up the slack, and allow our troops there a little bit of sleep and R&R? You can't just cut and run as many would be killed. This is the General's concern. So may you please understand that in order to vacate a situation, you must have someone to cover your back while you gather the tired troops and allow them to leave quietly.

Would you allow the Iraqi troops to "COVER OUR TROOPS BACKS WHILE THEY LEAVE". YEAH RIGHT! THE ONLY ONES I TRUST TO COVER OUR BACKS, ARE OUR OWN TROOPS.

That's military strategy 101 - if you ever take this in college, it's amazing. Never trust anyone other than your own troops to "have your back"!

GOD bless us one and all, always.
MBA-Boston Uiv.

Answer 11

NO---It has to do with vengence....the old man bush couldn't stand talk about desert storm failure to finish saddam off.
bushy wanted to make a mark cause he dodged every thing but cocaine-booze and women, she he wanted saddam for daddy's sake and history....

failure.............and continue failures and will continue till removed from office,