as you said when u answered my question because we only care about other countries and dont want a women to get hurt in combat. america can handle a mans death but not a womens
2007-01-10 13:51:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by onknown 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sorry, but no one has answered this problem 100% correctly. I was going to join the military, and that was the reason that I didn't. The recruiter told me that the reason women aren't allowed to be in combat is due to the fact that we can reproduce. That and the fact that most combat jobs involve lifting almost 80 lbs. above yoiur head and most women can't do this.
2007-01-10 13:44:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by wyldfyr23 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
In addition to all of the above comments, men and women serving together in a combat situation can get pretty dramatic. There's a lot of sexual tension and it's distracting. It's one thing to serve in co-ed units back at the base, but when you're out for a long time and need to focus on your mission, it can be dangerous to be attracted to the person on your right.
2007-01-10 14:25:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Women are prohibited by law from serving in certain military specialties. The list of open jobs is continually being changed( IE: now women can be fighter and helicopter pilots).
The main reason women aren't allowed in ground combat forces are.
1. social mores, the American public just doesn't want women in ground combat roles right now.
2. upper body strength ( the average women is just not as strong as the average man in upper body strength)
2007-01-10 12:49:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by jeeper_peeper321 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
For one as some human beings (who i'm particular are male) have been asserting (in much less soft approaches) women persons are no longer bodily in a position( in spite of the undeniable fact that it is debatable) of doing the trainings ..i'm particular there are women human beings available which could combat with the final of them yet its a scientific actuality that adult males have greater muscle tissues and so on. different than the debatable skill of ladies human beings bodily...there are themes which upward push up with a co-ed team that small ( progression of sexual relationships among team individuals, adult males risking their existence's to keep the female (purely because of the fact she is woman and that's how our society works). women persons are additionally stored out of combative roles because of the possibility of rape as a protection stress tactic from the enemy. I surely have heard horror thoughts from my boyfriend and my father with regard to the way warring parties handle hostage women human beings. ought to you think of a woman getting prepared at tips from a combatant being persistently raped just to alter into pregnant with a terrorists toddler?
2016-10-06 23:25:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do not know for sure , but i think it might have to do with the fact your "lady" parts could act up on a mission...but that is a good question.
2007-01-10 12:05:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by mrnibbles01 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Prohibited by your friendly Congressional laws......
Its the law....
2007-01-10 12:06:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by SnowWebster2 5
·
0⤊
0⤋